Tableware, kitchenware and accessories

This tender demonstrates strong quality in legal compliance, clarity, and fairness, with well-defined requirements and an objective evaluation process. Minor improvements could be made in providing full contract duration details in the basic information and integrating sustainability criteria.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type, uses an appropriate CPV code, and specifies standard exclusion and eligibility criteria, including compliance with international sanctions. Deadlines are reasonable, and there are no reported disputes. The use of ESPD and electronic submission aligns with EU/national procurement regulations.

The tender's objective is clearly stated. Requirements for participation, technical capabilities (product samples), financial offers (lowest 2-year total cost, unit prices), and submission procedures are well-documented and understandable across the various tender documents. The evaluation criteria are explicitly defined.

All essential basic information such as title, reference, organization, description, estimated value, and deadlines are provided. Key documents are attached and summarized. Requirements and evaluation criteria are defined. However, the NUTS code is missing, and while the contract duration is implied by the 2-year cost evaluation, it is not explicitly stated in the top-level information.

The tender promotes equal access through e-procurement and electronic submission. The estimated value is disclosed, and the evaluation criteria (lowest 2-year total cost) are objective and transparent. Requirements, including the submission of product samples, appear generic and not tailored to a specific company, ensuring a level playing field for potential bidders.

The tender fully supports electronic submission and e-procurement, enhancing accessibility and efficiency. While a specific contract start date is not in the basic info, it would be detailed in the framework agreement. The duration is implied by the 2-year cost, and financing information (estimated value) is available.

Key fields are consistently populated, and dates are logical and sequential. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The tender's internal documentation is consistent regarding evaluation criteria, despite an external automated check flagging it as missing.

The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement criteria, social aspects, or an innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.