← Back to Tenders
Estonia14 days leftOpen

Purchase of smart waste collection bins with fill level sensors and three-compartment separate collection litter bins

Tender Overview

LOCATION

Estonia, Estonia

VALUE

€78,600

DEADLINE

February 16, 2026 at 12:00

CATEGORY

Supplies

CPV CODE

34928480-6

REFERENCE

305596

Project Timeline

▼

Contact Information

▼
View Original

Original Tender Description

Nutikate täituvusanduriga jäätmekogumiskastide ning kolme sektsiooniga liigiti kogumise prügiurnide ost, tarne ja paigaldus.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • The tenderer must not have any exclusion grounds as stipulated in § 95 of the Public Procurement Act. The contracting authority will check these for the successful tenderer (reverse procedure).
✓

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Confirm compliance with the tender conditions.
  • If a joint bid, submit a power of attorney for the joint bid.
  • Adhere to the principles of equivalence.
  • Meet the qualification conditions described in the ESPD.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Supply and install 26 three-section recycling bins according to the technical description and illustrative material.
  • Supply and install 12 smart fill-level sensor waste bins according to the technical description and illustrative material.
  • Ensure the creation of a modern waste sorting infrastructure.
  • Optimize logistics using smart solutions.
  • Complete the contract within 2 months.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit the bid cost according to the cost table, including unit prices and total cost for smart waste bins, three-section recycling bins, transport, and installation.
  • The bid will be evaluated solely on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit the bid by 2026-02-16 12:00:00.
  • Confirm compliance with the tender conditions.
  • Submit the cost structure as required.
  • Fill in and submit the cost table (Lisa 2 Maksumuse tabel.xlsx).
  • If a joint bid, submit a power of attorney for the joint bid.
  • Agree to the terms of the draft contract.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Vastavustingimused
Hanke Tingimused305596_vastavustingimused.pdf4.6 KB
Summary:
This document outlines essential compliance conditions for bid submission, covering power of attorney for joint bids, confirmation of adherence to tender terms, the structure for presenting bid costs, and principles for demonstrating equivalence.
XLS
Lisa 2. Pakkumuse maksumustabel
Esitamise VormidLisa 2 Maksumuse tabel.xlsx10.3 KB
Summary:
This document is a tender cost table that must be completed with unit prices and total costs for smart waste collection bins, three-section sorting bins, transport, and installation.
PDF
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad
Hindamiskriteeriumid305596_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf2.8 KB
Summary:
This document outlines that bids will be evaluated solely based on the total price, with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.
PDF
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded305596_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitusteg...69.5 KB
Summary:
This document is an explanatory version of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), detailing the contracting authority's qualification conditions and exclusion grounds for the tender "Purchase of smart fill-level sensor waste bins and three-section sorted waste bins", intended for review only and not for submission.
DOC
Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldus
Tehnilised SpetsifikatsioonidLisa 1 RIIGIHANKE TEHNILINE KIRJELDUS.do...37.3 KB
Summary:
Narva City Government is procuring, delivering, and installing 26 three-section waste sorting bins and 12 smart fill-level sensor waste collection bins to establish modern waste sorting infrastructure and optimize logistics.
DOC
Lisa 3. Hankelepingu eelnõu
Lepingu MallLisa 3 Hankelepingu eelnõu.docx29.0 KB
Summary:
This document is a draft procurement contract outlining the terms and conditions of the agreement between Narva City Government's Department of City Management and the contractor for the purchase of smart waste bins and recycling urns.
PDF
TK lisa 1. Illustratiivne pildimaterjal (nutikad kastid)
Tehnilised SpetsifikatsioonidTK lisa 1 Illustratiivne pildimaterjal (...53.3 KB
Summary:
This document provides illustrative images and a sample of the smart waste bins, helping bidders understand the contracting authority's expectations.
PDF
TK lisa 2. Illustratiivne pildimatejal (kolme-sektsioonilised prügiurnid)
Tehnilised SpetsifikatsioonidTK Lisa 2 Illustratiivne pildimatejal (k...89.9 KB
Summary:
This document provides illustrative example images of three-section waste bins for separate collection and smart waste collection bins to clarify the products subject to the tender.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

78
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with comprehensive documentation and clear technical requirements, but it suffers from a significant inconsistency in the stated evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender appears compliant with national (Estonian) public procurement regulations, referencing RHS § 52 lg-s 3 and utilizing a reverse procedure for qualification checks, which is permissible. The CPV code is appropriate, and disclosure requirements are met. The generic 'Type: A' and 'Procedure: A' could be more specific for international clarity.

•Generic definition of procedure type 'A' could be more specific.
Clarity70/100

The description, technical requirements, and submission instructions are generally clear and well-documented with supporting materials. However, there is a direct contradiction between the 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' stated in the procurement characteristics and the explicit 'lowest price' evaluation method detailed in the financial requirements and Document 1.

•Contradiction in evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. 'lowest price').
Completeness90/100

The tender is highly complete, providing all essential information including title, reference, organization, deadlines, estimated value, and location. All necessary documents, such as technical specifications, draft contract, and cost table, are attached and processed.

Fairness85/100

Full document access is provided, the estimated value is disclosed, and the evaluation criteria ('lowest price') are objective and transparent. E-procurement is enabled, ensuring equal access. Requirements do not appear to be tailored to a specific company, with illustrative materials serving to clarify expectations.

•Illustrative material could potentially be too specific, though summaries suggest clarification.
Practicality80/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are fully supported, with a clear URL to the procurement portal. The contract duration is clearly specified as 2 months. While a specific contract start date is not provided, this is common practice.

•Contract start date is not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency60/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. The primary inconsistency lies in the conflicting statements regarding the evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' versus 'lowest price').

•Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description.
Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly include green or social procurement criteria. While the product (smart waste bins) inherently contributes to better waste management and logistics optimization, broader sustainability aspects are not integrated into the procurement process or evaluation. The tender is not EU funded.

•Lack of explicit green or social procurement criteria.

Strengths

Clear technical specifications and illustrative materials.
Support for e-procurement and electronic submission.
Transparent and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Comprehensive documentation, including draft contract and cost table.
Compliance with national procurement practices (e.g., reverse procedure).

Concerns

Contradiction in evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. 'lowest price').
Absence of explicit green and social procurement criteria.
Generic definition of procedure type 'A' could be more specific.
Potential for illustrative material to be overly specific, limiting competition.

Recommendations

1. Ensure consistency in the description of evaluation criteria across all tender documents, clearly stating 'lowest price' where applicable.
2. Consider integrating explicit green and social criteria into future tenders, such as requirements for sustainable materials or lifecycle costs.
3. Clarify the specific type of procurement procedure to enhance transparency for all potential bidders, including international ones.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
78/ 100 · Good
→

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes