Conclusion of a framework agreement for the purchase of hygiene products

This tender contains a critical contradiction between the stated subject matter (hygiene products) and the submission requirements (work glove samples), significantly undermining clarity, fairness, and practicality.

The tender adheres to basic procedural and disclosure requirements. However, the fundamental contradiction between the stated subject matter (hygiene products) and specific submission requirements (work gloves) introduces significant legal risk due to ambiguity and potential for non-compliance with principles of equal treatment and transparency.

The tender suffers from a critical lack of clarity. While some elements like evaluation criteria are clear, the core subject matter is ambiguous, with the tender title and CPV code indicating hygiene products, but key submission requirements and forms explicitly requesting work gloves. This fundamental contradiction makes it impossible for bidders to understand what is truly being procured.

While all structural components and documents are present, the tender is functionally incomplete due to the severe contradiction between the stated procurement subject (hygiene products) and the specific items requested in the submission forms (work gloves). This prevents bidders from submitting a fully compliant and relevant offer.

The profound inconsistency between the tender's stated purpose (hygiene products) and the actual submission requirements (work gloves) severely compromises fairness. It creates an uneven playing field, as only bidders with insider knowledge or those willing to guess the true intent could submit a relevant bid, potentially excluding qualified suppliers of either product category. This indicates a significant oversight or potential tailoring.

While the tender supports electronic submission and provides key dates, the fundamental contradiction regarding the product being procured makes practical participation extremely difficult. Bidders cannot reasonably prepare and submit physical samples of 'work gloves' for a tender explicitly titled 'hygiene products' without prior clarification, rendering the submission process impractical.

The tender exhibits a critical failure in data consistency. The title, CPV code, and technical description clearly specify 'hygiene products,' while the submission requirements and the bid form explicitly demand 'work gloves.' This direct contradiction across core tender documents is a severe inconsistency.

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or considerations related to environmental sustainability, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.