Labor hire for Enefit Industry OÜ

This tender for labor hire is generally well-structured with clear requirements and transparent evaluation criteria, though the unanalyzed technical task document and lack of explicit sustainability focus present minor areas for improvement.

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with reasonable submission deadlines, a clearly defined CPV code, and specified mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds. Participation is limited to EU, EEA, or WTO countries, aligning with regulations. The procedure type 'A' combined with 'Negotiation Allowed' could be more explicitly detailed for full clarity.

The tender description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are highly detailed and understandable, covering various worker types, skills, and equipment. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as the lowest price (100% weight). Performance conditions refer to the draft contract, which is standard.

Most essential information, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, deadlines, and location, is provided. Requirements, evaluation criteria, and contract duration (24 months) are clearly defined across the documents. However, the critical 'Tehniline ülesanne' document's content remains unanalyzed.

Fairness is strong, with the estimated value disclosed, reasonable deadlines, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price). Electronic submission and e-procurement are enabled, ensuring equal access. The tender is divided into parts, allowing specialized bidders. Requirements, while specific, appear to be industry-standard rather than tailored to a single company.

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, enhancing practicality. Financing information is indicated to be available in the contract documents, and the duration is specified. The lack of an explicit document URL in the provided text is a minor detail, and the unanalyzed zip file for the technical task could pose practical challenges.

Key fields are consistently populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. While the 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed value is a minor classification inconsistency, the actual data provided is largely coherent.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects beyond standard compliance, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.