Adaptation of Premises for Anne and Lille Youth Centres

This tender for adapting youth centers in Tartu demonstrates good clarity and data consistency, with a clear focus on accessibility for special needs students. However, it lacks explicit contract duration and comprehensive sustainability criteria beyond its inherent social aspect.

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, utilizing ESPD and defining exclusion grounds. Deadlines are reasonable, and the procedure type is indicated by codes. The CPV code is broadly acceptable for the scope, though a more specific one for youth centers could be considered.

The project description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are well-structured and understandable. Evaluation criteria are explicitly defined as the lowest price, ensuring transparency. Performance conditions are expected to be detailed in the provided draft contract.

Basic information, financial details, and timelines are largely complete. However, the estimated contract duration is not explicitly stated, which is a notable omission. While all documents are attached, the inability to analyze key files like construction projects and price tables due to format limits a full content assessment.

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, reasonable preparation time, and objective lowest-price evaluation criteria. Electronic submission ensures equal access, and the requirements appear generic, showing no signs of being tailored to a specific company.

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, enhancing practicality. The document URL for the opening place is provided. However, the absence of a clear contract start date and duration can pose practical challenges for bidders in resource planning and project scheduling.

The provided dates are logical and consistent, and there are no detected disputes or suspensions. Most key fields are populated, contributing to good data integrity.

While the tender does not explicitly focus on green procurement or innovation, its core objective of ensuring accessibility for students with special educational needs represents a significant and commendable social aspect. It is not EU funded.