← Back to Tenders
Estonia24 days leftOpen

Reconstruction of national road No. 59 Pärnu – Tori km 2.0–3.589 and rebuilding of a traffic-hazardous section at km 4.8–5.0

Tender Overview

ORGANIZATION

Transpordiamet

LOCATION

Estonia, Estonia

VALUE

€710,000

DEADLINE

February 26, 2026 at 13:00

CATEGORY

Construction

CPV CODE

45233142-6

REFERENCE

305511

Project Timeline

▼

Contact Information

▼
View Original

Original Tender Description

Riigitee nr 59 Pärnu – Tori km 2,0 – 3,589 taastusremont ja km 4,8 – 5,0 liiklusohtliku koha ümberehitus vastavalt riigihanke alusdokumentides toodud tingimustele. Ehitustöö teostamise tähtaeg on 3 kuud alates alustamiskorralduses märgitud kuupäevast. RHR-is märgitud hankelepingu eeldatav kogukestus sisaldab Tellija tööde vastuvõtmise perioodi, võimalikke lepingu pikendamisi ja muid võimalikke Tellija kohustusi, mille võrra võib lepingu teostamise periood pikeneda.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • The bidder must not be subject to exclusion grounds as per the procurement pass and the e-procurement environment.
  • The bidder must confirm the absence of sanctions.
  • First-tier subcontractors must not be subject to exclusion grounds related to criminal offenses (e.g., fraud, money laundering, human trafficking).
✓

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The bidder must meet the qualification conditions as per the procurement pass and the e-procurement environment.
  • The bidder must confirm acceptance of all bid terms and conditions.
  • The bidder must confirm adherence to business secrecy requirements.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Ability to perform rehabilitation works for National Road no. 59 Pärnu – Tori km 2.0–3.589.
  • Ability to perform reconstruction works for a dangerous spot on National Road no. 59 at km 4.8–5.0.
  • Ability to complete the contract within 4 months.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • The bid must include unit prices and total costs for all specified works in the HD IV Cost List.
  • The total cost in the HD IV Cost List must exclude reserve and VAT.
  • The bid will be evaluated solely on the lowest total price (excluding reserve and VAT).
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit the bid electronically via the e-procurement environment.
  • Electronically confirm familiarization with exclusion grounds and qualification conditions.
  • Submit confirmations regarding acceptance of bid terms, absence of sanctions, and business secrecy.
  • Submit the HD IV Cost List (Kululoend) with unit prices and total costs.
  • Submit relevant information about first-tier subcontractors for control purposes.
  • Submit the ESPD (European Single Procurement Document).
  • Submit the forms contained in the HD I Vormid.zip file.
  • Meet the submission deadline: 2026-02-26 13:00:00.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapis
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded305511_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingi...29.9 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the conditions for checking first-tier subcontractors during the contract execution phase, specifying grounds for their exclusion based on criminal convictions (e.g., fraud, money laundering, human trafficking) and requiring the tenderer to provide relevant information.
PDF
Vastavustingimused
Hanke Tingimused305511_vastavustingimused.pdf6.9 KB
Summary:
This document outlines mandatory tender submission conditions, including confirmations regarding acceptance of bid terms, absence of sanctions, and business secrets, and requires the submission of the HD IV cost list.
XLS
HD IV Kululoend
FinantsnõudedHD IV Kululoend.xlsx60.1 KB
Summary:
This cost list is the financial part of the bid, where the tenderer must enter unit prices and total costs for the restoration and reconstruction works on state road no. 59, including the hazardous section.
PDF
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad
Hindamiskriteeriumid305511_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf3.0 KB
Summary:
This document specifies that the tender will be evaluated solely based on the lowest price, with the total cost from the submitted cost list (excluding reserve and VAT) being the only evaluation criterion.
PDF
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded305511_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitusteg...73.0 KB
Summary:
This document is an explanatory ESPD outlining the bidder's exclusion grounds and qualification conditions that must be confirmed electronically, intended for familiarization with the terms, not for submission.
DOC
Riigihanke alusdokument
Hanke TingimusedRiigihanke alusdokument.docx34.1 KB
Summary:
This basic document provides an overview of the general terms of the public procurement, including contracting authority contact details, the procedure for electronic procurement, justifications for not dividing the tender into parts, and references to exclusion grounds and qualification conditions in the e-procurement environment.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

72
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road rehabilitation and reconstruction is generally well-structured and transparent, with clear project details and fair access. However, it presents a notable inconsistency in evaluation criteria and could enhance its sustainability focus.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender generally adheres to legal requirements, with reasonable deadlines and a clearly defined open procedure. CPV codes are appropriate, and mandatory disclosures, including value, are met. The initial inconsistency in stating evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price) is a minor legal risk, though clarified in specific documents.

•Inconsistency in stated evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price)
Clarity80/100

The project description, technical, and financial requirements are largely clear and understandable. Performance conditions are well-defined. However, there is some ambiguity regarding the specific ESPD document required for submission, as one document suggests it might not be needed while submission requirements explicitly ask for it.

•Ambiguity regarding specific ESPD document required for submission
Completeness70/100

All essential basic information, financial details, and timelines are provided. Key documents like the cost list, forms, and contract project are attached. However, the content of the attached ZIP files (HD I Vormid, HD II Hankelepingu projekt) could not be analyzed, preventing a full assessment of their internal completeness.

•Content of attached ZIP files (HD I Vormid, HD II Hankelepingu projekt) not analyzed
Fairness85/100

The tender demonstrates good fairness with full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and objective lowest-price evaluation criteria. E-procurement is enabled, ensuring equal access, and requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and duration is clearly specified. However, the contract start date is not fixed, depending on a commencement order, which introduces a slight planning uncertainty. Specific direct document URLs beyond the e-procurement portal are not provided.

•Contract start date not fixed
•Lack of specific direct document URLs
Data Consistency60/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. A significant inconsistency exists in the evaluation criteria, where the 'Characteristics' section lists 'relative_weighting' while the 'Financial Requirements' and a dedicated document (Document 4) clearly state 'lowest total price'.

•Contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative_weighting vs. lowest price)
Sustainability50/100

The tender explicitly mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive step. However, it lacks specific details on social aspects or innovation focus, and it is not EU funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.

•Lack of explicit social criteria
•Lack of explicit innovation focus

Strengths

Clear project description and specific location details
Reasonable submission deadline (28 days)
Value disclosed and objective lowest-price evaluation criteria
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled
Justification for not dividing the tender into parts is provided

Concerns

Inconsistency regarding evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price)
Ambiguity in ESPD submission instructions
Content of critical ZIP files (forms, contract project) not analyzed
Lack of explicit social or innovation criteria despite 'Green Procurement' flag
Contract start date is not fixed

Recommendations

1. Clarify the evaluation criteria to resolve the inconsistency between 'relative_weighting' and 'lowest price'.
2. Provide clear instructions on which ESPD document or electronic confirmation is required for submission.
3. Consider integrating specific social and innovation criteria into the tender documents to enhance sustainability aspects.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
72/ 100 · Good
→

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes