Open Fishing Ports Day 2026

This tender for the 'Open Fishing Harbours Day 2026' is generally well-structured with clear requirements, but suffers from significant data inconsistencies regarding evaluation criteria and value classification, alongside a lack of explicit sustainability considerations.

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, featuring reasonable deadlines, a defined procedure type (SE with negotiation), and appropriate CPV codes. However, the contradiction between 'relative_weighting' and '100% price' for evaluation criteria, and the 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed value, introduce minor legal clarity issues.

The description of the event and most requirements are clear and well-documented. However, the direct contradiction in the stated evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. 100% price) creates significant ambiguity for bidders, impacting overall clarity.

Most essential information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, and value, is provided. However, the explicit contract duration is not stated, and one attached document (a .zip file) was not processed for content analysis, indicating minor gaps in completeness.

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, reasonable submission deadlines, and support for e-procurement and equivalent offers. However, the 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside the disclosed value creates an unnecessary transparency issue. The financial turnover requirement (120,000 EUR for a 110,000 EUR contract) is slightly restrictive, potentially limiting smaller, capable firms.

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, enhancing practicality. However, the absence of an explicit contract start date and duration, and the lack of a direct document URL (though implied by e-procurement), present minor practical drawbacks for bidders.

The tender suffers from significant data inconsistencies. The most critical is the contradiction between 'relative_weighting' in the basic information and '100% price' as the sole evaluation criterion in the documents. Additionally, 'Value Classified: Yes' contradicts the explicit disclosure of the estimated value.

While the tender is EU funded, which often implies higher standards, it explicitly lacks any specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives into the procurement process.