Washing chemicals for washer-disinfector

This tender is generally well-structured with clear requirements and leverages e-procurement. However, a significant data inconsistency regarding evaluation criteria and a complete lack of sustainability considerations are notable drawbacks.

The tender largely complies with legal requirements, including reasonable deadlines and the use of ESPD. However, the contradiction between 'relative_weighting' in the characteristics and 'lowest price' in the evaluation criteria document is a legal compliance concern regarding transparency of evaluation. The procedure type 'A' is also vague.

The description, AI-extracted requirements, and submission instructions are generally clear and well-documented, referring to specific forms and annexes. The primary clarity issue stems from the contradiction in the evaluation criteria, though the specific document clarifies it.

The tender provides all essential information, including basic details, financial data, timeline, and location. All required forms and supporting documents are listed and summarized, contributing to a high level of completeness.

Fairness is well-maintained with full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and objective 'lowest price' evaluation criteria. The specification of 'Getinge' equipment is mitigated by the explicit acceptance of equivalent products, ensuring broader competition.

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, enhancing practicality. However, the absence of a specific contract start date and detailed financing information (beyond estimated value) slightly reduces its overall practicality for bidders.

The most significant issue is the inconsistency in the evaluation criteria, where the 'PROCUREMENT CHARACTERISTICS' state 'relative_weighting' while the AI-extracted requirements and a specific document clearly state 'solely on the basis of cost, with the lowest price'. This is a critical data inconsistency.

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.