Tenders

Dust control on local gravel roads of Setomaa municipality for the years 2026-2028

Open
Deadline
13 days left
March 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
305434
Value
€42,900
Location
Estonia
Published
February 06, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Dust suppression on Setomaa rural gravel roads for the years 2026-2028100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 16, 2026

Tender Opening

March 16, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€42,900
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
77
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€265,238
Avg. Bids
2.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
90%
843 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The contracting authority aims to find a contractor for dust control on local gravel roads of Setomaa municipality.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--The bid must be submitted electronically.
--A confirmation of bid compliance must be submitted.
--The bid price (cost per kilometer) in Euros must be submitted.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The economic operator must not be subject to mandatory exclusion grounds as per the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The economic operator must meet the qualification conditions described in the procurement passport (`hankepass`).
--The bid must comply with the conditions set out in the procurement documents.
--In case of joint bidders, all joint bidders must be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the contract.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The dust suppression service must comply with the technical requirements and specifications for local gravel roads in Setomaa Municipality for the years 2026-2028.
--The service must be performed according to the volume table provided in the tender documents, which includes road locations, lengths, and widths.
--The service must be provided during the years 2026-2028.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid must include the cost per kilometer in Euros, which will be used for evaluation.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305434_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 4.1 KB

This document outlines the conditions for submitting a tender, including confirming compliance with procurement documents, structuring the bid cost, declaring business secrets, and providing a power of attorney for joint bids.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305434_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

This document specifies that bids for dust suppression services on Setomaa rural gravel roads for 2026-2028 will be evaluated 100% based on the cost per kilometer, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305434_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 36.5 KB

This document is an explanatory procurement pass outlining the qualification conditions and required company information for the Setomaa municipality's gravel road dust suppression tender, to be submitted electronically.

HD Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
HD Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 17.0 KB

This document outlines the technical requirements and specifications for dust suppression services on local gravel roads in Setomaa municipality for the years 2026-2028.

HD Lisa 2 Vorm 1DOC
HD Lisa 2 Vorm 1.docx -- 13.1 KB

This form is a power of attorney for joint bidders, authorizing one party to represent others in the public procurement process and related contractual actions, confirming joint and several liability for contract performance.

HD Lisa 3 Töövõtulepingu projektDOC
HD Lisa 3 Töövõtulepingu projekt.doc -- 75.5 KB

This document is a draft service contract for dust suppression on local gravel roads in Setomaa municipality for 2026-2028, outlining the terms and obligations of the parties.

HD Lisa 4 Tolmutõrje lõikude mahutabelXLS
HD Lisa 4 Tolmutõrje lõikude mahutabel.xlsx -- 17.6 KB

This document provides a detailed volume table for dust suppression sections on local gravel roads in Setomaa municipality for the years 2026-2028, including road locations, lengths, and widths.

HD Tolmutõrje teostamine 2026-2028DOC
HD Tolmutõrje teostamine 2026-2028.doc -- 121.0 KB

This document outlines the general terms, requirements, and technical specifications for providing dust suppression services on local gravel roads in Setomaa municipality for the years 2026-2028.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

77
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for dust suppression services in Setomaa Municipality is generally well-structured with clear requirements and fair evaluation criteria, though it exhibits some data consistency issues regarding document requirements and lacks sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance80/100

The tender appears compliant with national regulations, featuring a reasonable submission period, appropriate CPV codes, and the use of ESPD. The procedure type (LM) is suitable for the estimated value. Minor inconsistencies in metadata do not fundamentally breach legal compliance.

Minor inconsistency in 'Value Classified' flag (stated as 'Yes' despite value being disclosed).
Clarity90/100

The service description is clear and unambiguous. Requirements, technical specifications, and evaluation criteria (100% lowest price) are well-documented and easily understandable, supported by comprehensive AI-extracted requirements.

Completeness70/100

All essential basic information, financial details, timelines, and location data are provided. A comprehensive set of documents, including technical specifications, volume tables, and a draft contract, is attached. However, the 'Required: No' flags for several critical documents are misleading, impacting the completeness of the tender's metadata.

Misleading 'Required: No' flags for essential tender documents (e.g., qualification conditions, evaluation criteria, technical specifications, draft contract).
Fairness95/100

The tender demonstrates high fairness with full document access, a disclosed estimated value, reasonable deadlines, and objective 100% price-based evaluation criteria. Electronic submission and e-procurement ensure equal access, and requirements appear generic, not tailored to a specific company.

Practicality75/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. The provision of detailed maps and technical documents enhances practicality. However, the misleading 'Required: No' flags for essential documents could create practical hurdles for bidders in identifying critical information.

Misleading 'Required: No' flags for essential documents could cause confusion for bidders.
Data Consistency60/100

Key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there are significant inconsistencies regarding document requirements. The ESPD is explicitly required in the AI-extracted submission requirements, but its corresponding document is marked 'Required: No' with a conditional description. Similarly, other essential documents are marked 'Required: No'.

Contradictory 'Required' flags for essential documents (e.g., ESPD, qualification conditions, technical specifications).
Minor inconsistency in 'Value Classified' flag.
Sustainability40/100

The tender does not include any specific criteria related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards. This is common for smaller, local service tenders.

Lack of green procurement criteria.
Absence of social aspects or innovation focus.

Strengths

Clear and unambiguous service description.
Objective evaluation criteria (100% lowest price).
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Reasonable submission deadline.
Comprehensive technical specifications and volume table provided.

Concerns

Inconsistent 'Required' flags for essential tender documents.
Contradictory information regarding ESPD submission.
Lack of sustainability (green, social, innovation) criteria.
Minor inconsistency in 'Value Classified' flag.

Recommendations

1. Correct the 'Required' flags for all essential tender documents to accurately reflect their necessity for bidders.
2. Clarify the requirement for ESPD submission, resolving the contradiction between the AI-extracted requirement and the document's metadata.
3. Consider incorporating relevant sustainability criteria in future tenders, even for basic services.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline