Procurement of IT services

This tender for IT services is well-structured and highly transparent, particularly in its clear requirements and fair evaluation criteria. While generally robust, minor inconsistencies and a lack of explicit sustainability focus are noted.

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, with reasonable deadlines, a clearly defined procedure type (Open), and proper CPV code assignment. The inclusion of an 'or equivalent' clause for standards enhances compliance with procurement principles. A minor inconsistency exists with 'Negotiation Allowed' being flagged for an Open procedure.

The tender exhibits excellent clarity. The description is unambiguous, requirements are well-documented and understandable, and evaluation criteria (lowest monthly service fee per user) are explicitly specified. Performance conditions are clearly referenced, and AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive.

The tender is largely complete, providing all basic information, estimated value, and a clear duration of three years with an extension option. All relevant documents are attached. The main gaps are the missing NUTS code and more precise location details for service delivery beyond the organizational names.

Fairness is a strong aspect of this tender. Full document access is provided, the estimated value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable. Evaluation criteria are objective and transparent (lowest price), and e-procurement is enabled. Requirements, including the 'or equivalent' clause for software, appear generic and not tailored.

The tender is practical, supporting electronic submission and clearly specifying the contract duration. Financing information refers to the draft contract. While the e-procurement system implies document access, direct URLs for individual documents are not provided, and an explicit contract start date is absent.

Data consistency is good, with most key fields populated and no disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical. Minor inconsistencies include the 'Negotiation Allowed' flag for an Open procedure and the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag despite the value being disclosed.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.