← Back to Tenders
Estonia25 days leftOpen

Reconstruction of Ülemiste Lake's Overflow Structure

Tender Overview

LOCATION

Estonia, Estonia

VALUE

€360,000

DEADLINE

February 27, 2026 at 11:00

CATEGORY

Construction

CPV CODE

45240000-1

REFERENCE

305401

Project Timeline

▼

Contact Information

▼
View Original

Original Tender Description

Hanke eesmärk on Ülemiste järve liigveelasu rekonstrueerimine. Hankija korraldab ettevõtjatele hankelepingu täitmise asukohaga tutvumiseks teabepäeva, mis toimub 10.02.2026 kell 11:00, Ülemiste veepuhastusjaamas. Hankija palub ettevõtjatel oma osalemisest teada anda RHRi teabevahetuse kaudu.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • Bidders must confirm the absence of exclusion grounds applicable to them.
  • Bidders must confirm that they will not use subcontractors subject to exclusion grounds (e.g., criminal offenses such as corruption and terrorism).
✓

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Bidders must provide answers regarding compliance with subcontractor control criteria.
  • Bidders must confirm that they will not use excluded subcontractors.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The bidder must have experience in constructing at least 100 meters of self-flowing sewage pipeline with a diameter of at least 1000 mm using an open trench method within the last 60 months.
  • All references in the tender documents to standards, technical approvals, technical control systems, sources of supply, processes, trademarks, patents, types, origins, production methods, labels, or test reports or certificates issued by conformity assessment bodies must be read as supplemented by the phrase "or equivalent".
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • (No specific financial requirements mentioned in the provided summaries.)
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Data on completed contracts must be submitted to prove experience.
  • In case of a joint bid, a power of attorney must be submitted.
  • Information considered a trade secret must be declared.
  • A work execution schedule must be submitted in the bid.
  • The bid must include the tender price.
  • The bid must be submitted by 27 February 2026 at 11:00:00.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapis
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded305401_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingi...39.4 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the conditions for checking subcontractors and grounds for their exclusion during the contract performance stage, focusing on criminal offenses such as corruption and terrorism, and requires the tenderer to provide answers regarding compliance with these criteria.
PDF
Vastavustingimused
Hanke Tingimused305401_vastavustingimused.pdf9.6 KB
Summary:
This document outlines tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint bid power of attorney, declaration of business secrets, confirmation of not using excluded subcontractors, and specifications for the work execution schedule.
PDF
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad
Hindamiskriteeriumid305401_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf2.8 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the tender evaluation methodology, where the sole criterion is the tender cost (100% weight), with the lowest-priced bid receiving the maximum score.
PDF
Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimused
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded305401_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitse...6.4 KB
Summary:
Bidders must confirm the absence of exclusion grounds and demonstrate experience in constructing at least 100m of self-flowing sewage pipeline with an inner diameter of at least 1000mm using the open trench method within the last 60 months, providing details of completed contracts.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

71
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the reconstruction of Ülemiste Lake overflow demonstrates good overall quality with clear objectives and strong legal compliance, but presents notable inconsistencies in evaluation criteria and a highly specific technical requirement that could limit competition.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, featuring a reasonable submission period and the crucial 'or equivalent' clause for technical specifications. However, the exact definition of the 'LM' procedure type could be more explicitly detailed.

•Procedure type 'LM' is not fully elaborated in the basic information.
Clarity80/100

The project description and most requirements are clear and understandable. A significant clarity issue arises from the contradiction between the 'relative_weighting' characteristic and the explicit statement that evaluation is based 100% on tender cost.

•Contradiction between 'relative_weighting' characteristic and '100% cost' evaluation criterion.
Completeness70/100

Most essential information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and duration, is provided. However, specific financial requirements are not detailed in the summaries, and the evaluation criteria document is unusually marked as 'Required: No'.

•Lack of specific financial requirements in the provided summaries.
•Evaluation criteria document marked as 'Required: No', which is unusual for such a critical document.
Fairness75/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-procurement, a disclosed value, and the 'or equivalent' clause. However, the highly specific technical capability requirement (100m, 1000mm sewage pipeline, open trench) might unduly restrict competition, despite being potentially justifiable for specialized work.

•Highly specific technical capability requirement (100m, 1000mm sewage pipeline, open trench) may limit competition.
Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and key dates like contract start and duration are specified. The provision for a site visit is also practical. A minor drawback is the absence of an explicit document URL in the provided information.

•Explicit document URL is not provided in the tender information.
Data Consistency70/100

While most data fields are populated and dates are logical, a significant inconsistency exists regarding the evaluation criteria, stating 'relative_weighting' while the document specifies '100% cost'. The 'Value Classified: Yes' also contradicts the explicit estimated value.

•Contradiction between 'relative_weighting' characteristic and '100% cost' evaluation criterion.
•'Value Classified: Yes' contradicts the explicit estimated value of 360,000.00 EUR.
Sustainability50/100

The tender positively includes Green Procurement and Social Criteria as characteristics. However, it lacks an explicit focus on innovation and is not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.

•No explicit innovation focus.
•Not EU funded.

Strengths

Clear project description and purpose.
Explicit 'or equivalent' clause for technical specifications, promoting fair competition.
E-procurement and electronic submission enabled.
Inclusion of Green Procurement and Social Criteria.
Site visit information day offered.

Concerns

Contradiction in evaluation criteria description (relative weighting vs. 100% cost).
Highly specific technical capability requirement which might limit competition.
Lack of specific financial requirements in the provided summaries.
'Value Classified: Yes' contradicts the explicit estimated value.
No explicit innovation focus.

Recommendations

1. Clarify the evaluation criteria to resolve the contradiction between 'relative_weighting' and '100% cost'.
2. Review the specificity of technical capability requirements to ensure they are proportionate and do not unduly restrict competition.
3. Provide more detailed financial requirements or explicitly state where they can be found if not in the contract terms.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
71/ 100 · Good
→

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes