Market survey preceding the procurement for "Organising data on cycling and walking infrastructure"

This market survey is well-structured and clear in its objectives, effectively engaging market participants for a future tender. While strong in clarity and data consistency, it could benefit from more comprehensive financial and location details to better inform potential bidders.

The market survey adheres to the general principles of public procurement by being transparent and open. Deadlines are reasonable, and the procedure type and CPV codes are correctly identified for a market survey. No legal disputes or suspensions are noted, indicating compliance with preparatory phase regulations.

The tender's purpose, description, and AI-extracted requirements are exceptionally clear and unambiguous, making it easy for market participants to understand what input is sought. The lack of formal evaluation criteria is appropriate for a market survey, as its primary goal is information gathering.

While basic information is present, the market survey lacks an estimated value for the future tender, specific NUTS codes, and explicit contract duration, which would provide more comprehensive context for potential participants.

The market survey promotes fairness through electronic submission, reasonable deadlines, and generic, non-tailored requirements. Full document access is provided. The non-disclosure of estimated value is a minor point for a market survey, as it does not hinder participation.

Electronic submission is a strong practical feature. However, the absence of an estimated value for the future tender and a clear duration limits market participants' ability to fully assess the potential scope and commitment required for the subsequent procurement.

The data provided is largely consistent and logical, with no noted disputes or suspensions. Dates are coherent. Missing fields are primarily related to the scope of a future tender rather than inconsistencies within the market survey data itself.

The market survey does not explicitly incorporate any green, social, or innovation criteria. While not mandatory for a market survey, their absence indicates a missed opportunity to signal future priorities for the subsequent procurement.