Estonia, Estonia
€170,000
February 25, 2026 at 12:00
Construction
305315
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
This tender is generally well-documented and clear, but contains a significant contradiction in the evaluation criteria that requires immediate clarification. While comprehensive in its requirements, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations.
The procedure type (Negotiated Procedure) and legal basis (RHS §52 lg 3) are clearly defined, indicating compliance with national law. However, the non-standard CPV code (6109) and the contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. 100% cost) are minor legal clarity issues.
The description of works and requirements are detailed and understandable. The primary clarity issue stems from the direct contradiction in evaluation criteria, which can cause significant confusion for bidders. The AI-extracted requirements are otherwise comprehensive.
The tender provides all essential basic information, deadlines, value, and location details. Requirements and criteria are thoroughly defined, and all necessary documents are attached or referenced, including large project files via OneDrive.
Full document access is provided, and the estimated value is disclosed. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company. However, the contradiction in evaluation criteria and the tie-breaking method (drawing lots) reduce overall transparency and potential for perceived fairness.
Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported. Project documents are referenced via a OneDrive link, which is a practical solution for large files. The contract duration is not explicitly stated in the basic information, which is a minor practical gap.
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, a significant inconsistency exists in the description of evaluation criteria. The 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside an explicit estimated value and the non-standard CPV code also contribute to minor data inconsistencies.
The tender lacks any explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes