Execution of electricity network works in Ida-Virumaa region

This tender for electricity network works in Ida-Virumaa is generally well-structured with clear requirements and an objective evaluation criterion. However, the inability to analyze key contractual documents and the lack of explicit framework agreement duration present notable completeness and practicality concerns.

The tender appears to comply with national procurement regulations, utilizing a simplified and negotiated procedure suitable for a utility company. CPV codes are appropriate, and deadlines are reasonable. No disputes or suspensions are noted. The 'Max Participants: 1' for a framework agreement is typically understood as the number of awarded suppliers, which is permissible.

The description of works, AI-extracted requirements, and evaluation criteria are clearly stated. However, the performance conditions refer to an unanalyzed framework agreement document, which reduces overall clarity regarding specific contractual obligations.

Basic information, financial details, timelines, and classification are well-populated. Requirements and evaluation criteria are defined. A significant concern is the inability to analyze two crucial zip files (framework agreement and annexes/forms), which likely contain essential detailed information for bidders, making the tender incomplete from an analysis perspective. The actual duration of the framework agreement is also not explicitly stated.

The tender promotes fairness through disclosed value, reasonable submission deadlines, objective price-based evaluation, and e-procurement. Requirements for technical capability and exclusion grounds appear generic. However, the extended payment terms (45/95 days) with an optional factoring program might commercially disadvantage smaller bidders.

Electronic submission is supported, and a contract start date is provided. Financing conditions are detailed. A key practical drawback is the absence of an explicit duration for the framework agreement, which is crucial for bidders to assess long-term commitment and resource planning.

Key fields are consistently populated, and dates are logical. There are no detected disputes or suspensions. The CPV code aligns well with the tender description.

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.