Tenders

Procurement of a roof structure for a bicycle parking lot

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
305256
Value
€50,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 05, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of bicycle parking canopy and installation100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 05, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 02, 2026

Tender Opening

March 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€50,000
Duration
5 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
81
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€99,138
Avg. Bids
2.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
93%
262 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the procurement is the acquisition of an outdoor canopy/roof structure suitable for covering a parking lot for bicycles and kick scooters. The subject of the procurement includes the acquisition and installation of the mentioned structure.
Green ProcurementEU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

27 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (8)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (11)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Bidders must electronically fill out the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--If submitting a joint bid, the "Lisa 3_Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx" form must be completed and submitted.
--Bidders must complete and submit "Vorm 1_Pakkumuse vorm.xlsx".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds specified by the contracting authority.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must meet the qualification requirements set by the contracting authority.
--If submitting a joint bid, a power of attorney must be provided, authorizing one bidder to act on behalf of others for bid submission and contract execution.
--Bidders must agree to the terms for acquisition, delivery, installation, and warranty as specified in the draft sales contract.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS11
--The procurement object is a single complete product (bicycle parking canopy) with installation.
--The canopy must meet specified dimensions.
--The canopy's materials must include a hot-dip galvanized metal frame.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The bid will be evaluated solely on the total cost of the bicycle parking canopy and installation.
--Bidders must provide detailed costs, including transport and installation, in the bid form.
--The cost structure must be provided.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305256_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.9 KB

This document details key tender submission conditions, covering power of attorney for joint bids, declaration of business secrets, confirmation of bid compliance, and cost structure, also referencing required forms.

Pakkuja esitab pakutava toote kirjelduse ja maksumuse vormil 1.XLS
Vorm 1_Pakkumuse vorm.xlsx -- 20.4 KB

Bidders must complete this form to describe the proposed bicycle parking canopy, specify the manufacturer, include a photo, and provide detailed costs, including transport and and installation, in accordance with minimum requirements.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305256_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document outlines the sole evaluation criterion for the Are bicycle parking shelter tender, which is the total cost of the shelter and installation, where the lowest price receives the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305256_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.0 KB

This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlining the contracting authority's conditions and requirements for bidder qualification and exclusion grounds, which companies must complete electronically.

AsendiskeemPDF
2026-01-22_Are rattaparkla katus_lisa 1-Skeem... -- 151.8 KB

This document is a layout plan for the Are school bicycle parking roof, showing existing bicycle racks, asphalt, concrete paving, and kerbs, along with the proposed location of the roof structure.

Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 20.1 KB

The document outlines the technical requirements for the Are bicycle parking roof structure, including dimensions, materials (hot-dip galvanized metal frame, sheet metal roof), color, weather resistance, the possibility of installing a sedum mat, and the need for installation.

Lisa 2_Müügilepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2_Müügilepingu projekt.docx -- 29.7 KB

This document is a draft sales contract between Tori Vallavalitsus and the tenderer, detailing the terms for the acquisition, delivery, installation, and warranty of a bicycle parking canopy.

Lisa 3_Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Lisa 3_Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 15.4 KB

This document is a power of attorney for joint bidders, authorizing one bidder to submit a bid and act on behalf of another bidder in the public procurement procedure and contract execution.

Pakkumuse kutse dokumentDOC
Pakkumuse kutse dokument.docx -- 40.7 KB

This document is an invitation to tender for the acquisition and installation of a bicycle parking shelter in Are, outlining the open procurement procedure, the scope of work, and general conditions regarding equivalence and data protection.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

81
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the acquisition of an Are bicycle parking canopy is generally well-structured and transparent, providing comprehensive documentation and clear requirements. Key strengths include detailed technical specifications, electronic submission, and a reasonable submission period, though a minor data inconsistency and limited sustainability scope are noted.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

Legal compliance is good, with a reasonable submission deadline and appropriate CPV code. A minor ambiguity exists regarding the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic for a 'Type A' procedure, which typically implies an open procedure where negotiation is not standard, though it might be permissible under national simplified procedures.

Ambiguity regarding 'Negotiation Allowed' for 'Type A' procedure.
Clarity85/100

The tender description is clear and unambiguous, and requirements are well-documented and understandable, supported by specific technical specifications and forms. Evaluation criteria are precisely defined as lowest price.

Completeness90/100

The tender is highly complete, containing all essential basic information, specified deadlines, estimated value, and duration. All necessary documents are attached, and requirements and criteria are thoroughly defined, including a helpful layout plan.

Fairness90/100

Fairness is excellent, with full document access, a disclosed estimated value, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria based on the lowest price. Electronic submission ensures equal access, and requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company.

Practicality80/100

Practicality is good, with full support for electronic submission and e-procurement. Financing information (EU Funded) is available, and duration is clearly specified. The absence of a specific contract start date is a minor point but does not hinder overall practicality.

Data Consistency70/100

Most data fields are consistent, but there is a notable inconsistency between the 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' stated in the basic information and the 'sole evaluation criterion... total cost... lowest price' detailed in the 'Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad' document.

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description (metadata vs. document).
Sustainability60/100

The tender is explicitly marked as 'Green Procurement' and 'EU Funded,' which are positive aspects. However, it lacks explicit social criteria and innovation focus, as noted by automated checks, limiting its overall sustainability score.

No explicit social criteria.
No explicit innovation focus.

Strengths

Clear and detailed technical requirements, including a layout plan.
Full support for electronic submission and e-procurement.
Reasonable submission deadline (25 days).
Disclosed estimated value and EU funding.
Comprehensive documentation, including draft contract and forms.

Concerns

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description (metadata vs. document).
Lack of explicit social criteria.
Lack of explicit innovation focus.
Ambiguity regarding 'Negotiation Allowed' for 'Type A' procedure.

Recommendations

1. Harmonize the description of evaluation criteria between metadata and tender documents.
2. Consider incorporating explicit social criteria and innovation aspects in future tenders.
3. Clarify the application of the 'Negotiation Allowed' condition within the context of the specified procedure type.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline