← Back to Tenders
Estonia0 days leftClosed

Execution of diving works

Tender Overview

ORGANIZATION

Enefit Power OÜ

LOCATION

Estonia, Estonia

VALUE

€25,000

DEADLINE

February 02, 2026 at 15:00

CATEGORY

Services

CPV CODE

98363000-5

REFERENCE

305235

Project Timeline

▼

Contact Information

▼
View Original

Original Tender Description

Enefit Power OÜ objektidel on seadmed, mis töötavad jahutusveetasemest allpool. Tulenevalt tööprotsessist on vaja kontrollida ja puhastada mehhanisme jõesetetest, mudast ja võõrkehadest.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • The bidder must not have committed crimes or have tax debt.
  • The bidder must confirm the absence of exclusion grounds.
✓

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The bidder must be registered in the commercial register.
  • The bidder must provide a register certificate if required.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The bidder must be capable of performing underwater equipment inspection.
  • The bidder must be capable of performing underwater equipment cleaning from sediments and foreign objects.
  • The work location is Enefit Power OÜ Auvere sites.
  • The bidder must have completed at least one diving-related contract within the last 36 months.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • The total bid cost is the sole evaluation criterion.
  • The bid must include the total bid cost.
  • The bid must include pricing for diving works and call-outs for two periods (1-12 months and 13-24 months).
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • The bid cost must be formatted according to requirements.
  • The bidder must define business secrets, if applicable.
  • The bidder must confirm the existence and compliance of technical equipment.
  • The bidder must follow instructions for participating in the small procurement e-procedure.
  • The bidder must submit the bid according to formatting and submission requirements.
  • The bid must comply with HAD conditions.
  • The bidder must submit pricing for diving works and call-outs for two periods (1-12 months and 13-24 months) using Form 1.
  • The bidder must submit a list of diving work contracts completed in the last 36 months using Form 2.
  • The bidder must indicate subcontractors whose references are relied upon in Form 2.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Vastavustingimused
Hanke Tingimused305235_vastavustingimused.pdf4.2 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the general conditions for tender submission, including requirements for offer cost formatting, business secret designation, and technical equipment confirmation.
XLS
Vorm 1. Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm
Esitamise VormidVorm 1 Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm.xlsx19.1 KB
Summary:
This tender cost form requires bidders to provide pricing for diving services and call-outs across two periods (1-12 months and 13-24 months) to submit the total tender cost.
DOC
Vorm 2. Lepingute nimekiri
ViitedVorm 2 Lepingute nimekiri.docx26.4 KB
Summary:
Bidders must submit a list of diving-related contracts completed in the last 36 months on Form 2 to demonstrate the completion of at least one such contract, also noting any subcontractors whose references are relied upon.
PDF
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad
Hindamiskriteeriumid305235_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf2.9 KB
Summary:
This document outlines that bids for diving works will be evaluated 100% based on the total cost of the offer, with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.
PDF
Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimused
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded305235_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitse...7.7 KB
Summary:
This document outlines bidder exclusion grounds (e.g., criminal offenses, tax debt) and qualification conditions (e.g., commercial register membership), requiring bidders to confirm their absence and, if applicable, submit a registration certificate.
PDF
Juhised pakkujatele
Hanke TingimusedJuhised pakkujatele_Väikehange RHR_14092...458.7 KB
Summary:
This document provides bidders with instructions for participating in the small procurement e-procedure, including how to request clarifications, format, and submit bids, emphasizing compliance with the tender documents.
DOC
Tehniline ülesanne
Tehnilised SpetsifikatsioonidTehniline ülesanne.docx29.9 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the technical task for diving work at Enefit Power OÜ's Auvere facilities, requiring the inspection and cleaning of underwater equipment from sediments and foreign objects.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

73
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for diving works is generally well-structured and clear, benefiting from electronic submission and transparent evaluation criteria. However, an inconsistency in evaluation criteria metadata and an unanalyzed critical contract document slightly reduce its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes appropriately for a small procurement. Deadlines are reasonable, and standard exclusion/eligibility grounds are present. However, the inconsistency between the 'Evaluation Criteria' field and the actual document's stated evaluation method is a minor legal compliance concern regarding transparency of process definition.

•Inconsistency between 'Evaluation Criteria' metadata (relative_weighting) and document content (100% total cost).
Clarity80/100

The description of the required works is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements are well-defined across all categories. Evaluation criteria are clearly specified within the relevant document, and performance conditions refer to the contract form.

Completeness70/100

All basic information, including title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location, is provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are defined. However, the critical contract document ('Töövõtulepingu vorm koos lisadega') was provided as a .zip file and its content could not be analyzed, leaving some details regarding performance and financing conditions unverified.

•Critical contract document (zip file) content not analyzed, limiting full verification of performance and financing conditions.
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through disclosed value, electronic submission, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price). The technical capability requirement (one diving contract in 36 months) is reasonable and not overly restrictive, suggesting no tailoring to a specific company.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, enhancing practicality for bidders. The contract duration is specified. However, the contract start date is not explicitly known, and detailed financing information is contained within the unanalyzed contract zip file, which impacts immediate practical understanding.

•Contract start date not explicitly stated.
•Detailed financing information is within the unanalyzed contract zip file.
Data Consistency70/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. However, a significant inconsistency exists between the 'Evaluation Criteria' field, which states 'relative_weighting', and the 'Hindamiskriteeriumid' document, which specifies 100% total cost evaluation.

•Inconsistency between 'Evaluation Criteria' metadata (relative_weighting) and document content (100% total cost).
Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, nor is it EU-funded, which typically implies higher sustainability standards. This indicates a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear description of required diving works and technical task.
Comprehensive and well-defined requirements for bidders.
Transparent and objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Reasonable technical capability requirement.

Concerns

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description (metadata vs. document).
Critical contract document (zip file) content not analyzed, limiting full verification.
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.

Recommendations

1. Correct the inconsistency in the 'Evaluation Criteria' field to accurately reflect the 100% lowest price evaluation method.
2. Ensure all critical documents, especially the contract form, are provided in an easily accessible and machine-readable format for full transparency and analysis.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability, social, or innovation aspects into future tenders, even for small procurements, where relevant.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
73/ 100 · Good
→

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes