Nursery works at RMK Purila nursery in 2026

This is a well-structured tender for nursery work, demonstrating good clarity, completeness, and fairness, particularly with detailed technical specifications and transparent evaluation criteria. However, it lacks any explicit focus on sustainability, social aspects, or innovation, which is a common area for improvement in public procurement.

The tender appears largely compliant with national and potentially EU regulations, utilizing standard e-procurement tools like ESPD. Deadlines are reasonable, and CPV codes are appropriate. The 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic for an 'Open' procedure, while potentially permissible under specific national laws, could benefit from clearer justification within the tender documents.

The tender provides a clear description of the required services and detailed technical specifications for seedling handling, sorting, and packaging. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as lowest price. The AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and easy to understand.

All essential information, including title, reference, organization, value, deadlines, and location, is provided. Comprehensive documentation, including an ESPD guide, draft contract, and detailed technical instructions, ensures a complete tender package.

The tender demonstrates high fairness with full document access, disclosed value, reasonable submission deadlines, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price). E-procurement ensures equal access, and requirements appear generic and not tailored to any specific company. The justification for not dividing the tender and the strategy for regional tenders further enhance fairness.

Electronic submission is supported, and the e-procurement portal URL is provided. The contract duration is clearly specified. While a precise contract start date is not given, the context (spring work 2026) provides sufficient practical guidance for bidders.

Key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no detected suspensions or disputes. The only minor inconsistency is the terminology used for evaluation criteria, as noted under clarity.

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.