Estonia13 days leftOpen

Tartu County, Nõo Parish, Nõo small town, connection of properties Kiriku street 1,3,5,7 to the electricity grid, Part II (LC3383)

Tender Overview

ORGANIZATION

Elektrilevi OÜ

LOCATION

Estonia, Estonia

VALUE

€187,000

DEADLINE

February 16, 2026 at 11:00

CATEGORY

Construction

CPV CODE

45310000-3

REFERENCE

305145

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

Hange on välja kuulutatud Kiriku tn 1,3,5,7 kinnistute liitumiseks elektrivõrguga madalpingel, Nõo alevik, Nõo vald, Tartu maakond. Ehitada vastavalt projektile ja lisatingimustele. Tööde üleandmise tähtaeg on 10.08.2026. Komplektalajaamad, jaotustrafod, keskpinge maakaablid 240 mm2 ja arvestid hangib Elektrilevi ja annab töövõtjale paigaldamiseks üle. Elektrilevi poolt hangitavate seadmete ja materjalide transport ning sellega kaasnevad kulud Elektrilevi tarnepartnerilt objektile kuuluvad töövõtja töö mahtu.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • The tenderer must not have committed crimes, have tax debts, or be bankrupt.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The bid must comply with the basic tender documents.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The tenderer's personnel must possess A-competence.
  • The tenderer's personnel must have switching rights.
  • The tenderer's personnel must have a C-person registration in the EPP environment.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • The bid must include the total cost excluding VAT.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • The tenderer must confirm the absence of exclusion grounds (crimes, tax debts, bankruptcy).
  • The bid must be submitted in accordance with the basic tender documents.
  • A completed cost table must be submitted.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Vastavustingimused
Hanke Tingimused305145_vastavustingimused.pdf9.5 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the tender's compliance conditions, requiring a conforming offer, a detailed cost table, and specific personnel qualifications (A-competence, switching rights, and a C-person) to be registered in the EPP environment.
PDF
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad
Hindamiskriteeriumid305145_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf2.9 KB
Summary:
This document specifies that offers will be evaluated solely based on the lowest total cost, excluding VAT, with the lowest price being the most advantageous.
PDF
Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimused
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded305145_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitse...9.5 KB
Summary:
This document outlines mandatory and voluntary exclusion grounds, such as criminal offenses, tax debts, and bankruptcy, and requires bidders to confirm their absence for tender participation.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with clear basic information and objective evaluation criteria, but the inability to analyze critical project documents hinders a full assessment of its clarity and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes appropriately, and the submission deadline is reasonable (18 days). It appears to comply with national regulations, especially given its EU funding. However, a minor inconsistency exists between the stated 'relative_weighting' evaluation criteria and the document summary specifying 'lowest total cost'.

Minor inconsistency in evaluation criteria description (relative weighting vs. lowest price).
Clarity80/100

The project description, scope, and performance conditions are clearly stated, often referencing external, accessible documents. Evaluation criteria are unambiguous (lowest price). However, the inability to analyze crucial .zip and .xls documents (e.g., 'Projekt', 'Lihthanke alusdokumendid') means the full clarity of the technical details cannot be confirmed from the provided content.

Critical project and basic procurement documents (zip/xls) were not analyzable, limiting full assessment of technical clarity.
Completeness70/100

Basic information, financial details, and timelines are comprehensively provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are defined in the analyzable documents. However, the inability to process key documents like the 'Projekt' and 'Lihthanke alusdokumendid' due to file format limitations for AI analysis significantly impacts the completeness of the information available for this assessment.

Critical project and basic procurement documents (zip/xls) were not analyzable, leading to incomplete information for assessment.
Fairness85/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and the submission deadline is reasonable. Evaluation criteria are objective and transparent (lowest price). Electronic submission and e-procurement are enabled, promoting equal access. Technical requirements (A-competence, switching rights, C-person in EPP) are specific to the electrical industry but appear standard and not tailored to a specific company.

The 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed estimated value is slightly ambiguous, though the estimate is public.
Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date and detailed financing conditions are clear. The duration for work completion is specified. However, the reliance on external links for performance conditions and the unanalyzed critical project documents could pose practical challenges for bidders in fully grasping all requirements within a single platform.

Critical project documents (zip/xls) were not analyzable, potentially impacting practical understanding of technical scope.
Reliance on external URLs for performance conditions requires navigation outside the tender platform.
Data Consistency90/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. No disputes or suspensions are detected. The primary inconsistency is the conflicting description of evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' vs. 'lowest total cost').

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description (relative weighting vs. lowest price).
Sustainability50/100

The tender is identified as EU-funded, which often implies higher standards. However, based on the provided information and automated checks, there are no explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria included in this specific tender.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear project description and scope.
Reasonable submission deadline (18 days).
Objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Detailed financial payment terms.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.

Concerns

Critical project and basic procurement documents (zip/xls) were not analyzable by AI, limiting full assessment.
Minor inconsistency in evaluation criteria description.
Lack of explicit green, social, or innovation procurement criteria.
Ambiguity regarding 'Value Classified: Yes' despite a disclosed estimated value.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in easily analyzable formats (e.g., PDF) or provide comprehensive summaries within the tender notice.
2. Clarify any minor inconsistencies in the tender characteristics, such as the evaluation criteria description.
3. Consider integrating specific green, social, or innovation criteria where applicable for future tenders, especially for EU-funded projects.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
75/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes