← Back to Tenders
Estonia14 days leftOpen

Reconstruction of Vormsi Hullo village wastewater treatment plant - repeat tender

Tender Overview

LOCATION

Estonia, Estonia

VALUE

€350,500

DEADLINE

February 16, 2026 at 09:00

CATEGORY

Construction

CPV CODE

45252100-9

REFERENCE

305117

Project Timeline

▼

Contact Information

▼
View Original

Original Tender Description

Hanke eesmärk on hankelepingu tulemusena koostada Vormsi Hullo küla reoveepuhasti tööprojekt ja teostada puhasti rekonstrueerimine. Objekti aadress on Biopuhasti, Hullo Küla, Vormsi vald, Lääne Maakond, katastritunnus: 90701:001:0834, link asukohale: https://minu.kataster.ee/cadastre/90701:001:0834.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • Subcontractors must not have committed criminal offenses or possess reliability issues that would be grounds for their exclusion during the contract performance stage.
✓

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Bidders must confirm compliance with qualification requirements.
  • Bidders must declare acquaintance with and agreement to the tender conditions.
  • For joint bids, a power of attorney is required.
  • Bidders must adhere to the principles of equivalence for proposed solutions (if applicable).
  • Bidders must agree to the terms of the draft contract.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The bid must cover the full scope of works for the Vormsi Hullo village wastewater treatment plant reconstruction, including general costs, demolition works, and installation of new components.
  • The bidder must be capable of executing the entire project, as the contract is not divided into parts and the works are interconnected and necessary for achieving a common goal.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Bidders must submit unit and total costs for each work item as per the Bill of Quantities.
  • Bidders must adhere to the specified cost submission structure.
  • The total cost of works will be the sole evaluation criterion (100% weighting), with the lowest bid being considered the best.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Bidders must electronically fill out the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
  • Bidders must submit a confirmation of bid compliance.
  • Bidders must submit a Bidder's Confirmation form, declaring agreement with tender conditions and compliance with qualification requirements.
  • If relying on other entities' resources, bidders must provide relevant data in the Bidder's Confirmation form.
  • Bidders must submit unit and total costs for each work item using the provided Bill of Quantities (Töömahuloend.xlsx).
  • Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-02-16 09:00:00.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapis
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded305117_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingi...26.0 KB
Summary:
This document details the conditions for checking subcontractors and the grounds for exclusion of first-tier subcontractors during the contract execution phase, requiring them to provide information regarding criminal offenses and reliability.
PDF
Vastavustingimused
Hanke Tingimused305117_vastavustingimused.pdf7.6 KB
Summary:
This document outlines tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint tenderers' power of attorney, confirmation of tender compliance, cost presentation structure, and principles of equivalence.
DOC
Pakkuja kinnitused
Esitamise VormidPakkuja kinnitused_Vormsi Hullo reoveepu...40.2 KB
Summary:
This document is a bidder's confirmation form where the bidder declares understanding and agreement with the tender terms, compliance with qualification requirements, and, if applicable, provides details on relying on other entities' resources.
XLS
Töömahuloend
Esitamise VormidTöömahuloend.xlsx17.5 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the scope of work for the reconstruction of the Vormsi Hullo village wastewater treatment plant, covering general costs, demolition, and installation of new components, requiring bidders to provide unit and total costs for each work item.
PDF
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad
Hindamiskriteeriumid305117_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf2.9 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the Vormsi Hullo village wastewater treatment plant reconstruction repeat tender, where the sole criterion is the total cost of works (100% weight), with the lowest offer being considered the best.
PDF
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded305117_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitusteg...77.4 KB
Summary:
This document serves as an informational guide to the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), detailing the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats for the Vormsi Hullo village wastewater treatment plant reconstruction tender, which bidders must complete electronically.
DOC
Juhised Pakkujale_Vormsi Hullo reoveepuhasti
Hanke TingimusedJuhised Pakkujale_Vormsi Hullo reoveepuh...44.8 KB
Summary:
This document provides instructions to bidders, outlining the general terms and submission requirements for the open procurement procedure concerning the design and reconstruction of the Vormsi Hullo village wastewater treatment plant.
DOC
Töövõtulepingu projekt_Vormsi Hullo reoveepuhasti
Lepingu MallTöövõtulepingu projekt_Vormsi Hullo reov...78.5 KB
Summary:
This document contains the draft contract terms and legal framework for the reconstruction of the Vormsi Hullo village wastewater treatment plant.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

82
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the Vormsi Hullo village wastewater treatment plant reconstruction is generally well-structured and transparent, providing comprehensive documentation and clear requirements. While it excels in clarity, completeness, and fairness, there is a notable absence of sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

Deadlines are reasonable, CPV codes are appropriate, and there are no reported disputes. The procedure type could be more explicitly named in the basic information, but overall compliance with legal requirements appears strong.

•Procedure type (Code A, E) could be more explicitly described in basic information.
Clarity80/100

The project description, requirements, and performance conditions are clearly stated and well-documented. A minor inconsistency exists between the 'relative_weighting' characteristic and the '100% cost' evaluation criterion, though clarified in Document 4.

•Minor inconsistency in evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. '100% cost').
Completeness90/100

All essential information, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, deadlines, and detailed location, is provided. The tender includes a comprehensive set of documents, including a draft contract and Bill of Quantities.

Fairness95/100

The estimated value is disclosed, deadlines are reasonable, and evaluation criteria (100% lowest price) are objective and transparent. E-procurement and electronic submission ensure equal access, and requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company.

Practicality80/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date is known. While financing information refers to the draft contract, the overall project duration and a direct document URL are not explicitly detailed in the basic information.

•Overall project duration beyond contract start date not explicitly detailed.
•Direct document URL not provided in basic information (though implied by e-procurement).
Data Consistency85/100

Key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. The only minor inconsistency is the description of evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' vs. '100% cost'), which is clarified by specific documents.

•Minor inconsistency in evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. '100% cost').
Sustainability20/100

The tender explicitly lacks any green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus, and is not EU funded. This indicates a significant missed opportunity for integrating sustainability principles.

•No green procurement criteria.
•No social criteria.

Strengths

Clear and comprehensive documentation, including draft contract and Bill of Quantities.
Transparent and objective evaluation criteria (100% lowest price).
Reasonable submission deadline and full disclosure of estimated value.
Support for e-procurement and electronic submission.
Detailed location information and clear project objective.

Concerns

Lack of sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Minor inconsistency in the description of evaluation criteria.
Overall project duration beyond contract start date not explicitly detailed.
No direct document URL provided in the basic information.

Recommendations

1. Integrate sustainability criteria (e.g., energy efficiency, material lifecycle, environmental impact) into future tenders for infrastructure projects.
2. Ensure absolute consistency in the description of evaluation criteria across all tender documents and summaries.
3. Clearly state the expected project duration or completion timeline in the basic information or description.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
A
Tender Quality Score
82/ 100 · Excellent
→

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes