Construction works for adapting the environment for persons with functional disabilities

This tender for construction works to adapt environments for persons with disabilities is generally well-structured with clear requirements and EU funding, but critically lacks disclosed estimated value and explicit evaluation criteria, significantly impacting fairness and transparency.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code, has a reasonable submission period, and shows no disputes. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant legal compliance and transparency issue.

The project description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and well-documented across multiple parts. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria creates a major ambiguity for bidders regarding how their proposals will be assessed.

Basic information, deadlines, duration, and specific locations are well-provided. While detailed requirements for submission are present, the tender is incomplete due to the undisclosed estimated value and the critical omission of evaluation criteria.

Fairness is significantly compromised by the undisclosed estimated value and, most critically, the complete absence of evaluation criteria, making the assessment process opaque. The flag for 'restricted document access' also poses a potential barrier, though requirements appear generic.

The tender supports e-procurement and clearly specifies contract duration and EU funding. However, the 'restricted document access' flag indicates a potential practical hurdle for bidders, and the contract start date is not provided.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. The primary inconsistencies are the undisclosed estimated value and a contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and an automated check flagging 'No e-submission'.

The project's core purpose is inherently social (adapting for persons with disabilities). While it is EU-funded, the tender documents do not explicitly include green procurement, additional social criteria for bidders, or innovation focus in the procurement process itself.