EDR DHS 1.1. Crushing of used wooden sleepers

This tender is generally well-structured and transparent, utilizing a Dynamic Purchasing System for hazardous waste management. While explicitly green, it lacks explicit social and innovation aspects.

The tender demonstrates strong legal compliance, with a clearly defined Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) procedure, appropriate CPV codes, and reasonable submission deadlines. The use of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) aligns with EU/national regulations, and no disputes or suspensions are reported.

The tender's description is clear and unambiguous, detailing the service of crushing creosote-impregnated sleepers. Requirements are well-documented through various attached documents and AI-extracted summaries, and evaluation criteria (lowest price) are explicitly stated.

All essential information, including title, reference, organization, financial details, and duration, is provided. A comprehensive set of documents, including technical specifications and a draft contract, supports the tender. The only minor gap is the absence of an explicit contract start date.

Fairness is a strong point, with full document access, disclosed estimated value (despite a 'classified' flag), and reasonable deadlines. The evaluation criteria based solely on the lowest price are objective and transparent, and e-procurement ensures equal access. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company.

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, enhancing practicality. Financing information is available in the draft contract, and the duration is clearly specified. The absence of an explicit document URL (though implied by e-procurement) and contract start date are minor practical considerations.

Key fields are largely populated, and dates are logical and consistent. Minor inconsistencies include the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag despite the estimated value being disclosed, and a slight difference in the general vs. specific description of evaluation criteria.

The tender explicitly identifies as 'Green Procurement,' which is positive given the nature of hazardous waste management. However, it lacks explicit social criteria and an innovation focus, and it is not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.