Estonia, Estonia
€2,500,000
February 23, 2026 at 11:00
Services
305024
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
This tender is generally well-documented, but significant inconsistencies regarding the procedure type and evaluation criteria reduce clarity and data consistency. While most aspects are robust, these contradictions pose a risk to the procurement process.
Legal compliance is generally good, with standard exclusion and eligibility criteria, and adherence to e-procurement principles. However, the broad CPV code and the contradictions between the stated procedure type ('A' for Open) and 'Negotiation Allowed', as well as 'relative_weighting' versus '100% lowest cost' for evaluation criteria, introduce minor legal ambiguities.
The tender description and requirements are mostly clear and well-documented across the provided files. However, the fundamental contradictions in the basic information regarding the evaluation criteria and the allowance for negotiation within an 'Open' procedure significantly diminish overall clarity for potential bidders.
The tender is comprehensive, providing all essential basic information, financial details, timelines, and a full set of relevant documents, including mandatory forms. The specific location and detailed requirements contribute to a complete tender package.
The tender appears fair, with the estimated value disclosed, reasonable preparation time, and objective evaluation criteria (lowest cost). Electronic submission ensures equal access. While technical requirements are specific to the equipment, this is generally justifiable for specialized maintenance services and does not indicate tailoring.
Practicality is good, with electronic submission supported and clear contract duration. Financing information is referenced to contract documents. The absence of an explicit document URL in the basic info and an exact contract start date are minor practical omissions.
Data consistency is a significant concern due to critical contradictions. The discrepancy between 'relative_weighting' and '100% lowest cost' for evaluation criteria, and between 'Open' procedure and 'Negotiation Allowed', represents fundamental inconsistencies that can confuse bidders and undermine the integrity of the process.
The tender lacks specific criteria related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles into a significant public contract.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes