Procurement of electronic auction environment service

This tender for an electronic auction environment service is generally well-structured and compliant, providing essential information and clear requirements, though it lacks explicit sustainability criteria. Minor inconsistencies in procedure coding and value classification are noted.

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, utilizing ESPD and having reasonable deadlines. However, the procedure type 'LM' lacks a standard code, and the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicts the disclosed estimated value.

The tender description, technical specifications, and evaluation criteria are clearly articulated, making the requirements and expectations understandable for potential bidders.

Most essential information, including basic details, financial figures, and a comprehensive set of documents, is provided. A minor detail gap exists in the exact location specification.

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and objective evaluation criteria. The requirement for a solution 'used for at least 24 months' is a common stability measure, not indicative of tailoring.

Electronic submission is supported, and contract duration is clear. However, an explicit contract start date is missing, and the funding source is not detailed beyond the estimated value.

Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no detected disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies exist with N/A codes for procedure type and the 'Value Classified' flag.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green, social, or innovation criteria. While this is common for certain service procurements, opportunities for such considerations might have been missed.