Maintenance services for Emajõe Centre

This tender for Emajõe Centre's maintenance services demonstrates good overall quality with clear requirements and strong data consistency, though it has notable limitations in promoting sustainability and innovation.

The tender exhibits good legal compliance, with a reasonable submission deadline, clear CPV code, and no detected disputes. The use of ESPD and e-procurement aligns with national and EU regulations. The procedure type 'A' is likely understood nationally but could benefit from explicit definition for broader international clarity.

The tender's description, evaluation criteria (lowest price), and AI-extracted requirements are generally clear and unambiguous. Performance conditions are outlined, and the draft contract provides further detail. However, the clarity of detailed specifications within the unanalyzed .xlsm files cannot be fully assessed.

All essential information, including basic details, financial data, timeline, duration, and location, is comprehensively provided. A substantial number of documents are attached, ensuring a complete tender package. The inability of AI to process certain file formats (.xlsm, .xml) is a technical limitation of the analysis, not a deficiency in the tender's completeness.

Fairness is generally good, with full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price). E-procurement ensures equal access. However, the decision not to divide the tender into parts and the explicit prohibition of alternative solutions may limit participation from smaller businesses or innovative bidders, slightly reducing overall fairness.

The tender scores highly on practicality, supporting electronic submission and e-procurement. The contract's expected start date and duration are clearly specified, and the estimated value is provided. Document access is facilitated through the e-procurement environment.

Data consistency is excellent, with all key fields populated, no detected disputes or suspensions, and a logical, consistent timeline for all dates.

While 'Green Procurement' is listed as a characteristic, the tender lacks detailed, measurable green criteria in the AI-extracted requirements beyond general compliance for consumables. There are no explicit social criteria, and innovation is actively discouraged by disallowing alternative solutions. The tender is not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.