Tenders

Warehousing service

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
304953
Value
€1,500,000
Location
Estonia
Published
January 30, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid price (500 euro pallets, 48 months)100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 30, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 03, 2026

Tender Opening

March 03, 2026

Contract Start Date

March 04, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€1,500,000
Duration
48 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€324,130
Avg. Bids
2.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
93%
100 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Warehousing service
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

20 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (9)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (6)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--Complete the electronic European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--Submit a power of attorney for signing documents, if the bid and qualification documents are signed by an authorized person.
--Submit a power of attorney for submitting a joint bid, if applicable.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Comply with EU sanctions concerning subcontractors and suppliers related to the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Meet participation conditions, including requirements related to the bidder's country of establishment.
--Accept the terms and conditions of the draft warehouse service contract.
--If relying on the economic, financial, or technical capacity of another entity for qualification, submit the relevant form, confirming joint liability for contract performance.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Meet requirements for warehouse location.
--Meet requirements for warehouse size.
--Meet requirements for warehouse temperature control.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit the total bid price for the entire contract period (48 months), which will be evaluated based on 500 EUR units.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
304953_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.3 KB

This document outlines mandatory compliance conditions for bidders, covering EU sanctions regarding subcontractors and suppliers linked to the Russian Federation, the submission of a power of attorney for joint bidders, and rules for declaring business secrets.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304953_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

This document outlines the bid evaluation methodology, where 100% of the weighting is given to the total bid cost (500 euro pallets, 48 months), with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304953_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 66.7 KB

This is an explanatory document detailing the conditions of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the contracting authority's requirements and qualification criteria, but it is not for submission as the actual ESPD must be completed electronically.

Hankedokument (RHAD)DOC
Hankedokument (RHAD) (17).docx -- 53.7 KB

This document serves as the foundational tender document for the "Warehouse Service" procurement, detailing the contracting authority's information, contact person, legal basis, procurement process via the public procurement register, and participation conditions, including bidder country-of-establishment requirements.

RHAD Lisa I Vorm 1_kinnitused pakkumuse kohtaDOC
HD Lisa I Vorm 1_kinnitused pakkumuse kohta.d... -- 39.6 KB

This form serves as a bidder's declaration, confirming their understanding and acceptance of the tender terms, their capability to fulfill the contract, and providing consent for data verification.

RHAD Lisa I Vorm 2_teise ettevõtja vahenditele tuginemineDOC
HD Lisa I Vorm 2_teise ettevõtja vahenditele ... -- 37.0 KB

This form is required for tenderers who wish to rely on another company's economic, financial, or technical competence for qualification in a public procurement, simultaneously confirming joint responsibility for contract performance.

RHAD Lisa I Vorm 3_volikiri ühispakkumuse esitamiseksDOC
HD Lisa I Vorm 3_volikiri ühispakkumuse esita... -- 37.6 KB

This document is a power of attorney for submitting a joint bid, authorizing one tenderer to represent another in the public procurement 'Warehouse Service'.

RHAD Lisa I Vorm 4_volikiri dokumentide allkirjastamiseksDOC
HD Lisa I Vorm 4_volikiri dokumentide allkirj... -- 38.0 KB

This document is a power of attorney authorizing a person to sign the tender offer and qualification documents for the public procurement 'Warehouse Service'.

RHAD Lisa III - Laoteenuse hankelepingu projektDOC
RHAD Lisa III - Laoteenuse hankelepingu proje... -- 53.0 KB

This document is a draft contract for storage services, outlining the terms, scope, duration, and maximum value of the agreement between AS Eesti Varude Keskus and the future service provider.

RHAD Lisa II - tehniline kirjeldus/pakkumuse vormDOC
RHAD Lisa II - tehniline kirjeldus (1).docx -- 32.8 KB

This document outlines the technical requirements for AS Eesti Varude Keskus's warehouse service, including location, size, temperature, humidity, equipment, and accessibility, and serves as a tender form for bidders to confirm their compliance with these specifications.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

Overall, this tender for warehouse services is well-structured and transparent, particularly regarding its evaluation criteria and electronic process, though it lacks explicit sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with reasonable deadlines, clearly defined CPV codes, and explicit mention of EU sanctions and mandatory exclusion grounds. No disputes or suspensions are reported. A minor ambiguity exists with 'Procedure: A' alongside 'Negotiation Allowed' and the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag despite the value being disclosed.

Minor ambiguity regarding 'Procedure: A' and 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic.
Minor metadata inconsistency: 'Value Classified: Yes' despite the estimated value being disclosed.
Clarity80/100

The tender description is clear, and requirements are well-categorized and understandable through AI-extracted summaries. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as 100% price-based, ensuring transparency. Performance conditions are outlined in the draft contract and technical specifications.

Completeness70/100

All basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and duration, is provided. A comprehensive set of 11 documents is attached, with required forms clearly identified. Location information is also present. While the structure is complete, the depth of detail within the AI summaries of the documents is limited, making it harder to fully assess the completeness of the content itself.

Limited insight into the full depth of detail within all tender documents based on AI summaries.
Fairness85/100

Fairness is strong due to the 100% price-based evaluation criteria, which is highly objective and transparent. Electronic submission ensures equal access, and the ability to rely on other entities for qualification enhances competition. The justification for a single provider is provided, and there is no strong evidence to suggest requirements are tailored to a specific company, though specific technical requirements always carry a potential risk.

Specific technical requirements (location, size, etc.) could potentially limit competition, though no direct evidence of tailoring is present.
Practicality65/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, with a clear contract start date, estimated value, and duration. The opening place URL is provided, implying document access through the portal. However, the number of specific forms required for submission, while standard, could be perceived as slightly burdensome for bidders.

The number of specific submission forms might be slightly burdensome for bidders.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields are consistently populated, and dates are logical and sequential. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The only minor inconsistency is the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag appearing alongside the disclosed estimated value.

Minor inconsistency between 'Value Classified: Yes' and the explicit disclosure of the estimated value.
Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly include green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, as indicated by automated checks. It is also not EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.

Absence of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear and objective 100% price-based evaluation criteria.
Comprehensive set of required documents and forms.
Full electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Detailed breakdown of eligibility and technical requirements.
Reasonable timeline for bid preparation.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Potential for specific technical requirements to limit competition (though not confirmed as tailored).
Minor inconsistency in metadata ('Value Classified: Yes' vs. disclosed value).
The number of required submission forms could be perceived as slightly burdensome.

Recommendations

1. Integrate sustainability, social, or innovation criteria where applicable to align with modern procurement best practices.
2. Ensure technical specifications are as generic as possible to maximize competition, while still meeting operational needs.
3. Review and clarify any metadata inconsistencies in future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline