Creation, implementation, and administration of a unified national library system solution and a shared search solution

This tender for a national library system is well-structured with comprehensive documentation and clear requirements, demonstrating good legal compliance and fairness, though it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve clarity regarding its contractual framework.

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with reasonable deadlines (43 days), a clearly defined negotiated procedure, and appropriate CPV codes. The use of ESPD and reference to the Public Procurement Act indicate adherence to national and EU regulations. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

The tender description is clear, and requirements are well-documented through numerous forms and detailed technical specifications provided in both Estonian and English. Evaluation criteria are specified as 'relative_weighting' and further detailed in a dedicated document.

All essential information, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, deadlines, and duration, is comprehensively provided. The tender includes a robust set of 17 documents, covering all necessary forms, technical specifications, and contractual drafts.

The tender exhibits high fairness with full document access, a disclosed estimated value, and reasonable preparation deadlines. The support for e-procurement and electronic submission ensures equal access. Evaluation criteria are objective and transparent, and requirements appear generic, not tailored to a specific company.

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. While a direct document URL is not explicitly provided in the summary, it is implied by the e-procurement characteristic.

All key fields are populated, and there are no detected suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent throughout the tender information. The 'Over Sum Limit: No' flag is likely a system artifact and does not indicate internal data inconsistency.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability principles.