← Back to Tenders
Estonia14 days leftOpen

Ultrasound devices (re-procurement for parts 2 and 3)

Tender Overview

LOCATION

, Estonia

VALUE

€54,000

DEADLINE

February 16, 2026 at 12:00

CATEGORY

Supplies

CPV CODE

33100000-1

REFERENCE

304769

Project Timeline

▼

Contact Information

▼
View Original

Original Tender Description

Ultraheliaparaatide ostmine vastavalt alusdokumentidele.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • Comply with EU sanctions for all subcontractors and suppliers.
  • Meet the exclusion grounds conditions set by the contracting authority as described in the ESPD.
✓

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Fulfill all participation conditions outlined in the general procurement documents (RHAD Üldosa).
  • Joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.
  • Supplier must meet the expected qualifications for performing maintenance work as described in the draft contract (Lisa IV).
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Offer ultrasound machines that meet the minimum technical requirements for gynecological and fetal examinations (as specified in Lisa I).
  • Offer ultrasound machines that meet the minimum technical requirements for breast and gynecological examinations (as specified in Lisa II).
  • Be prepared to provide a demo device for testing for both Part 1 (Fetal UHA) and Part 2 (Breast UHA).
  • Submit a medical device declaration for the offered device (Part 2).
  • The offered solution's image quality and usability will be evaluated (58% weight).
  • The offered solution's technical specifications exceeding minimum requirements will be evaluated (2% weight).
  • Be capable of performing maintenance work as per the draft contract (Lisa IV).
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Provide a total cost proposal for ultrasound machines and related maintenance services.
  • The cost proposal will be evaluated (40% weight).
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-02-16 12:00:00.
  • Provide contact person details.
  • Declare any business secrets.
  • Complete and submit the cost form (Lisa III) for ultrasound machines and maintenance services.
  • Complete and submit the technical specification form (Lisa I) for Part 1 (Fetal UHA), confirming compliance.
  • Complete and submit the technical specification form (Lisa II) for Part 2 (Breast UHA), including bidder data and details of the offered device.
  • Adhere to the general procurement information and conditions (RHAD Üldosa).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Vastavustingimused
Hanke Tingimused304769_vastavustingimused.pdf21.3 KB
Summary:
This document outlines tender submission requirements, including providing contact person details, submitting a power of attorney for joint bids, declaring business secrets, and confirming compliance with EU sanctions regarding subcontractors and suppliers.
XLS
Lisa III_Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm (osadele 1 ja 2)
Esitamise VormidLisa III_Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm_304769...13.9 KB
Summary:
This document is a tender cost form to be completed for the offer of ultrasound devices and related maintenance services, requiring the total cost to be entered into the evaluation criteria worksheet.
DOC
Lisa II_Tehniline kirjeldus/pakkumuse vorm
Tehnilised SpetsifikatsioonidLisa II_Tehniline kirjeldus pakkumuse vo...47.2 KB
Summary:
This offer form details the minimum technical requirements for an ultrasound machine for breast and gynecological examinations, requiring bidders to provide their details, proposed device specifications, a medical device declaration, and readiness for a demo device test.
DOC
Lisa I_Tehniline kirjeldus/pakkumuse vorm
Esitamise VormidLisa I_Tehniline kirjeldus pakkumuse vor...48.8 KB
Summary:
This document details the minimum technical specifications for an ultrasound machine for gynecological and fetal examinations, requiring bidders to complete an offer form, confirm compliance, and be prepared to provide a demo device for testing.
PDF
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad
Hindamiskriteeriumid304769_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf6.0 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the evaluation criteria and weighted proportions for ultrasound machine bids (parts 2 and 3), covering offer price (40%), image quality and usability (58%), and technical specifications exceeding minimum requirements (2%).
PDF
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded304769_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitusteg...63.7 KB
Summary:
This document is an explanatory Hankepass (ESPD) outlining the contracting authority's conditions for exclusion grounds and qualification requirements, intended for review and not for direct submission.
DOC
Lisa IV Hankelepingu projekt
Lepingu MallLisa IV_Hankelepingu projekt_304769docx....51.0 KB
Summary:
This document is a draft procurement contract for the acquisition and maintenance of ultrasound devices, outlining general terms, party obligations, and expected supplier qualifications.
PDF
RHAD Üldosa
Hanke TingimusedRHAD Üldosa_Ultraheliaparaadid (osade 2 ...225.5 KB
Summary:
This document is the general part of the tender documents for Aktsiaselts Ida-Tallinna Keskhaigla's repeat procurement of ultrasound devices (reference number 304769), outlining general tender information, participation conditions, division into parts, and references to technical specifications and other appendices.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

78
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for ultrasound machines demonstrates good clarity and fairness with well-defined evaluation criteria and electronic submission. However, it has moderate completeness and practicality concerns due to missing contract duration and specific location details, and lacks explicit sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender exhibits good legal compliance with reasonable deadlines, appropriate CPV codes, and no reported disputes. It explicitly requires adherence to EU sanctions. While the procedure type 'A' is generic, the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic provides context, and the presence of ESPD and detailed requirements aligns with national and EU procurement principles.

•The procedure type 'A' (Code: A) is somewhat generic and could be more explicitly defined within the context of national procurement law.
Clarity90/100

Clarity is strong, with a concise description and comprehensive AI-extracted requirements covering exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission aspects. Evaluation criteria are clearly specified with weighted proportions in Document 3, directly contradicting the automated flag. Technical specifications in Lisa I and II are detailed and understandable.

•The automated check incorrectly flagged 'No evaluation criteria specified', which is contradicted by the detailed 'Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad' document and AI-extracted requirements.
Completeness70/100

Most essential information, including basic details, deadlines, and estimated value, is present, and all 9 documents are attached. However, the tender lacks explicit contract duration and specific location information (NUTS code is missing), which are important for full completeness.

•Missing explicit contract duration.
•Missing specific location information (NUTS code).
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and enabled e-procurement. Evaluation criteria are transparent, including a significant weight for image quality and usability, which will be assessed via demo devices, fostering objective comparison. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company.

•The high weight on 'image quality and usability' (58%) could introduce subjectivity if not managed with robust and transparent scoring rubrics for the demo device tests.
Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and a URL for the opening place is provided. However, the practicality is moderately impacted by the absence of an explicit contract start date and duration. Financing information beyond the estimated value is also limited.

•Missing explicit contract start date.
•Missing contract duration.
Data Consistency90/100

Data consistency is good, with key fields mostly populated and logical, consistent dates. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The primary inconsistency is the automated flag regarding missing evaluation criteria, which is disproven by the document content.

•The automated check incorrectly flagged 'No evaluation criteria specified', which is contradicted by the detailed document content.
•NUTS code is missing.
Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria, nor is it indicated as EU funded. While common for standard equipment procurement, this represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability goals.

•Absence of explicit green procurement criteria.
•Absence of explicit social aspects.

Strengths

Clear and detailed evaluation criteria with specified weights.
Comprehensive AI-extracted requirements covering all key aspects.
Support for electronic submission and e-procurement.
Reasonable submission deadline and transparent value disclosure.
No disputes or suspensions, indicating a smooth process.

Concerns

Missing explicit contract duration.
Lack of specific location information (e.g., NUTS code).
Absence of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
High weight on 'image quality and usability' (58%) could be subjective if not managed with clear scoring rubrics for demo tests.
Generic procedure type code 'A' without further explanation.

Recommendations

1. Explicitly state the contract duration in the tender documents.
2. Provide specific location details (e.g., NUTS code, delivery address).
3. Consider incorporating sustainability, social, or innovation criteria in future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
78/ 100 · Good
→

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes