← Back to Tenders
Estonia24 days leftOpen

Healthcare decision support software

Tender Overview

ORGANIZATION

Tervisekassa

LOCATION

Kus tahes, Estonia

VALUE

€3,850,000

DEADLINE

February 26, 2026 at 13:00

CATEGORY

Services

CPV CODE

72212900-8

REFERENCE

304754

Project Timeline

▼

Contact Information

▼
View Original

Original Tender Description

Riigihanke ese on tervishoiu otsustustoe tarkvara ja kasutusõiguse ostmine koos Eesti ravijuhendite ja geeniandmetel põhinevate algoritmide lisamisega tarkvarale. Täpsem tehniline kirjeldus on lisatud (Lisa 1).
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • The bidder must meet the mandatory exclusion grounds specified in the electronic European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
✓

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The bidder must meet the qualification conditions described in "Juhised pakkujale_0.pdf", including previous contracts.
  • The bidder must fill the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) electronically in the information system.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The offered software must be patient-based decision support software.
  • The software must meet the technical, functional, non-functional, and maintenance requirements described in "Lisa_1_Tehniline_kirjeldus_0.docx".
  • The software must be installed in TEHIK's hosting environment.
  • Healthcare professionals must be granted usage rights for the software for up to 7 years.
  • The software must support decision-making processes based on Estonian treatment guidelines and genetic data.
  • The bidder must submit a detailed technical description.
  • The bidder must submit an overview of recommendation adaptation solutions.
  • The bidder must submit documents and confirmations to prove additional functionalities (POL-1, POL-2, POL-3).
  • The offered software must include international guidelines and/or evidence-based treatment recommendations in medical fields, which must be indicated in "Lisa_5_Valdkondade_vorm.xlsx".
  • Additional functionalities will be considered in the evaluation (40% weight), including international guidelines, recommendation display method, and AI possibilities.
  • The bidder must comply with the obligations described in the Data Processing Agreement (DPA) template according to GDPR.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • The bidder must meet the net turnover conditions described in "Juhised pakkujale_0.pdf".
  • The bidder must submit the total cost of the service for seven years without VAT.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • The bidder must fill the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) electronically in the information system.
  • The bidder must submit a detailed technical description.
  • The bidder must submit an overview of recommendation adaptation solutions.
  • The bidder must submit documents and confirmations to prove additional functionalities (POL-1, POL-2, POL-3).
  • The bidder must fill out "Lisa_5_Valdkondade_vorm.xlsx", indicating the medical fields in which the offered software includes international guidelines and/or evidence-based treatment recommendations.
  • The bidder must fill out the cost form "Lisa_3_Maksumuse_vorm.xlsx", entering the total cost of the service for seven years without VAT.
  • All tender documents must be submitted to the public procurement register.
  • The submission deadline for the bid is 2026-02-26 at 13:00:00.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Vastavustingimused
Tehnilised Spetsifikatsioonid304754_vastavustingimused.pdf10.3 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the technical requirements for healthcare decision support software, requiring bidders to submit a detailed technical description, an overview of recommendation customization solutions, and documentation/confirmations to demonstrate compliance and earn points for additional functionalities (POL-1, POL-2, POL-3).
XLS
Lisa 3. Maksumuse vorm
Esitamise VormidLisa_3_Maksumuse_vorm.xlsx9.7 KB
Summary:
Bidders must complete this cost form, entering the total service cost for seven years excluding VAT, and submit it to the public procurement register.
XLS
Lisa 5. Valdkondade vorm
Esitamise VormidLisa_5_Valdkondade_vorm.xlsx10.8 KB
Summary:
Bidders must indicate the medical fields in which their proposed decision support software includes international guidelines and/or evidence-based treatment recommendations.
PDF
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad
Hindamiskriteeriumid304754_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf3.1 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria and methodology, with 60% weight given to the offer price and 40% to additional functionalities.
PDF
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded304754_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitusteg...69.2 KB
Summary:
This document is an explanatory version of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), detailing the contracting authority's conditions and the expected format for responses, intended for review rather than direct completion, as the bidder must fill out the ESPD electronically in the information system.
PDF
Juhised pakkujale
Hanke TingimusedJuhised_pakkujale_0.pdf131.8 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the terms for Tervisekassa's healthcare decision support software tender, including contract duration, service details, and bidder qualification criteria such as net turnover and prior relevant contract experience.
DOC
Lisa 1.1 Teave ravijuhenditest ja geeniandmetest
Üldine InfoLisa_1_1_Teave_ravijuhenditest_ja_geenia...22.3 KB
Summary:
This document describes the need and objectives for healthcare decision support software based on Estonian treatment guidelines and genetic data, aiming to improve treatment quality and support healthcare professionals' decision-making processes.
DOC
Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldus
Tehnilised SpetsifikatsioonidLisa_1_Tehniline_kirjeldus_0.docx25.3 KB
Summary:
This document describes the technical, functional, non-functional, and maintenance requirements for patient-specific decision support software to be installed in TEHIK's hosting environment, with usage rights granted to healthcare professionals for up to 7 years.
DOC
Lisa 2. Lepinguprojekt
Lepingu MallLisa_2_Lepinguprojekt.docx40.8 KB
Summary:
This document is a draft contract for the healthcare decision support software, outlining the terms, scope, and validity of the agreement between Tervisekassa and the selected service provider.
DOC
Lisa 4. Hindamismetoodika
HindamiskriteeriumidLisa_4_Hindamismetoodika.docx32.5 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the evaluation methodology for the healthcare decision support software tender, detailing the assessment criteria split between offer cost (60%) and additional functionalities (40%), including international guidelines, recommendation display methods, and AI capabilities.
DOC
Lisa 6. Andmekaitsekokkulepe
Lepingu MallLisa_6_Andmekaitsekokkulepe.docx33.7 KB
Summary:
This document is a template for a Data Processing Addendum (DPA) outlining the general conditions and obligations for processing personal data by the controller and processor in accordance with GDPR.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

83
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender for healthcare decision support software is well-structured and clear, demonstrating strong legal compliance and practicality, though it could improve on explicit sustainability criteria beyond innovation and resolve minor data inconsistencies.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender demonstrates strong legal compliance with reasonable submission deadlines (29 days), clear procedure codes (Type T, Procedure A with negotiation allowed), appropriate CPV classification, and no detected disputes. The use of ESPD and a DPA template (GDPR compliance) further reinforces adherence to regulations.

Clarity90/100

The tender's description is clear and unambiguous. Requirements are well-documented, categorized, and refer to specific supporting documents. Evaluation criteria are explicitly defined with relative weighting (60% price, 40% additional functionalities), ensuring transparency for bidders.

Completeness85/100

All essential basic information, financial details, timeline, and duration are comprehensively provided. A robust set of 12 tender documents, including technical specifications, contract drafts, and submission forms, ensures thoroughness. The only minor omission is a specific NUTS code, though 'Kus tahes' (Anywhere) is provided for location.

•Missing NUTS code
Fairness75/100

Full document access, reasonable deadlines, and objective evaluation criteria contribute to fairness. Electronic submission is enabled for equal access. However, the contradiction between 'Estimated Value: 3,850,000.00 EUR' and 'Value Classified: Yes' creates a minor transparency issue. The decision not to divide the tender into parts, while justified for a single full-service provider, could limit competition.

•Contradiction in 'Value Classified' field
•Potential for limited competition due to 'single full-service provider' approach
Practicality90/100

The tender is highly practical, supporting electronic submission and e-procurement. The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, and the estimated value is disclosed. The provision of the e-procurement portal URL for opening further enhances accessibility.

Data Consistency80/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no detected suspensions or disputes. The primary inconsistency lies in the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag appearing alongside a clearly stated 'Estimated Value', which is contradictory.

•Contradiction between 'Value Classified: Yes' and disclosed 'Estimated Value'
Sustainability60/100

The tender demonstrates a focus on innovation by including 'AI possibilities' as an evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit criteria for green procurement or social aspects, and it is not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.

•Absence of explicit green procurement criteria
•Absence of explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear and comprehensive requirements
Well-defined evaluation criteria with relative weighting
Robust electronic submission and e-procurement process
Reasonable submission deadline (29 days)
Strong focus on innovation (AI possibilities as evaluation criterion)

Concerns

Contradiction regarding value classification ('Value Classified: Yes' vs. disclosed 'Estimated Value')
Absence of explicit green and social procurement criteria
Potential for limited competition due to 'single full-service provider' approach (though justified)
Missing NUTS code

Recommendations

1. Clarify the 'Value Classified' field to ensure full transparency regarding the estimated value.
2. Consider integrating explicit green and social procurement criteria to enhance the tender's overall sustainability profile.
3. Ensure qualification criteria (e.g., net turnover, previous contracts) are proportionate to maximize competition, even with a single-provider approach.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
A
Tender Quality Score
83/ 100 · Excellent
→

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes