Estonia28 days leftOpen

Ordering Signs for Territories, Buildings and Premises

Tender Overview

LOCATION

Estonia, Estonia

VALUE

€280,000

DEADLINE

March 03, 2026 at 10:30

CATEGORY

Supplies

CPV CODE

44423450-0

REFERENCE

304729

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

Riigihanke eesmärk on erinevate siltide tellimine sise- ja välitingimustesse koos kohaletoimetamisega ning vajadusel paigaldamisega.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • The bidder must meet the conditions for the absence of exclusion grounds stipulated in the Public Procurement Act.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Vastavustingimused
Hanke Tingimused304729_vastavustingimused.pdf6.6 KB
Summary:
This document specifies tender submission requirements, covering joint tenderer authorization, declaration of business secrets, confirmation of tender compliance, and the procedure for presenting costs.
XLS
Lisa 1.1. Tehnilise kirjelduse „Territooriumite, ehitiste ja ruumide siltide tel...
Esitamise VormidLisa 11 Tehnilise kirjelduse lisa_pakkum...25.5 KB
Summary:
This tender form requires bidders to submit unit prices for various types of signs for territories, buildings, and rooms, as specified in the technical description.
PDF
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad
Hindamiskriteeriumid304729_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf4.1 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria, detailing how bids will be scored based on the cost of outdoor, warning, and indoor signs, as well as the design hourly rate, with the lowest price receiving the highest points in each category.
PDF
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded304729_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitusteg...70.9 KB
Summary:
This document explains the purpose and structure of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), which serves as a self-declaration by the tenderer outlining the tender conditions and the information expected from the company, but is not to be filled out directly.
DOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus
Tehnilised SpetsifikatsioonidLisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx3.5 MB
Summary:
This document outlines the technical specifications for indoor and outdoor signs, including material requirements, durability, design approval process, and color codes, to be ordered by the Estonian Centre for Defence Investments, Defence Resources Agency, and Defence Forces, including delivery and, if necessary, installation.
DOC
Lisa 2 Julgeolekutingimused
TurvanõudedLisa 2 Julgeolekutingimused_koos_lisadeg...83.0 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the security conditions, definitions, and procedures, including background checks and entry applications, applicable to personnel working within Defence Forces security areas for the tender "Ordering signs for territories, buildings and premises".
DOC
Raamlepingu projekt
Lepingu MallRaamleping_projekt_304729.docx70.0 KB
Summary:
This document is a draft framework agreement for the procurement of various indoor and outdoor signs and related services, outlining the contract terms and the seller's obligations.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured and comprehensive, providing necessary documentation and supporting electronic submission. It demonstrates good transparency and fairness, particularly through the intent to award contracts to multiple suppliers under a framework agreement.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender largely complies with procurement regulations, featuring reasonable deadlines and standard international participation rules. However, the specific naming of the procurement procedure ("Type A", "Procedure A") could be more explicitly aligned with common EU terminology for enhanced clarity.

Ambiguous naming of procurement procedure type.
Clarity80/100

The tender documents are well-detailed and understandable, covering technical specifications, security conditions, and clear evaluation criteria based on relative weighting and lowest price. The description of the procurement object is unambiguous.

Completeness70/100

Most essential information, including basic details, financial data, timelines, and location, is provided. A comprehensive set of documents is attached, although the content of one XML-formatted ESPD could not be analyzed, which is a minor gap.

Content of ESPD XML document not analyzed.
Fairness85/100

The tender exhibits good fairness, with full document access, disclosed value, and objective evaluation criteria. The decision not to divide the procurement into parts is mitigated by the stated intention to conclude contracts with multiple companies, promoting broader market participation.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are fully supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. While the exact contract start date is not explicitly stated, this is common for framework agreements. The platform URL for opening is provided.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

All key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating a stable and well-managed tender process.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green, social, or innovation-focused procurement criteria. While the technical specifications imply durability, explicit sustainability requirements are absent, leading to a neutral assessment in this area.

Absence of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear evaluation criteria based on lowest price.
Support for electronic submission and e-procurement.
Commitment to multiple supplier contracts under framework agreement.
Comprehensive set of tender documents.
Transparent value disclosure.

Concerns

Ambiguous naming of the procurement procedure type.
Lack of explicit sustainability (green, social, innovation) criteria.
Content of one ESPD XML document not analyzed.

Recommendations

1. Clarify the specific type of procurement procedure using standard EU terminology.
2. Integrate explicit sustainability criteria (e.g., material recycling, energy efficiency) into technical specifications or evaluation.
3. Ensure all tender documents, including machine-readable formats, are fully accessible and analyzable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
75/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes