, Estonia
€4,430,000
February 16, 2026 at 09:00
Construction
304659
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
This tender is generally well-structured but contains significant data inconsistencies and omissions that impact legal compliance and overall clarity. While many aspects are positive, critical information gaps and contradictions need addressing.
The tender suffers from an incorrect CPV code (9290 'Miscellaneous services' instead of a construction-related code for road building) and a missing NUTS code, which are significant legal compliance issues. There's also ambiguity regarding the procedure type (negotiation allowed vs. lowest cost criterion).
The project description and AI-extracted requirements are clear. However, the inability to analyze crucial technical specifications and contract appendices (due to .zip file format) and the procedural contradictions reduce overall clarity for potential bidders.
While basic information is present, the tender is incomplete due to the inability to analyze critical documents (technical specifications, contract appendices, forms) provided as .zip files. The NUTS code is missing, and the specific contract duration for the works is not explicitly stated.
The tender demonstrates good fairness with disclosed value, objective 'lowest cost' evaluation criteria, and enabled e-procurement. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company, and deadlines are reasonable.
Electronic submission is well-supported, enhancing practicality. However, the absence of an explicit contract start date and the specific duration for the works, along with no direct document URL (beyond the e-procurement portal), slightly reduce the practicality score.
This category presents significant issues. There are direct contradictions regarding the CPV code, whether negotiation is allowed versus the sole 'lowest cost' evaluation criterion, and whether the tender is 'Divided into Parts' versus the stated 'rationale for not dividing the tender into parts'.
The tender explicitly mentions 'Green Procurement', which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks any stated focus on social criteria or innovation, and it is not indicated as EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes