Estonia14 days leftOpen

Construction of Surfacing for Gravel Roads in Jõgeva, Tartu, Põlva, Võru and Valga Counties 2026

Tender Overview

ORGANIZATION

Transpordiamet

LOCATION

, Estonia

VALUE

€4,430,000

DEADLINE

February 16, 2026 at 09:00

CATEGORY

Construction

CPV CODE

45233120-6

REFERENCE

304659

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

Kruusateedele katete ehitamine Jõgeva, Tartu, Põlva, Võru ja Valga maakonnas 2026 vastavalt riigihanke alusdokumentides toodud tingimustele.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • The tenderer and its subcontractors must not have committed criminal offenses (e.g., fraud, money laundering) that would lead to exclusion during the contract performance stage.
  • The origin of the offered goods and services must be free from sanctions.
  • Specific qualification and exclusion conditions must be checked in the e-procurement environment.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The tenderer must confirm acceptance of all tender conditions.
  • In case of a joint bid, authorization for the representative must be provided.
  • The tenderer must be capable of performing gravel road surfacing works in Jõgeva, Tartu, Põlva, Võru, and Valga counties in 2026.
  • The tenderer must adhere to the general administrative rules of public procurement.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The tenderer must be capable of performing gravel road surfacing works in Jõgeva, Tartu, Põlva, Võru, and Valga counties in 2026 as described in the draft contract and technical specifications (HD III).
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • The bid must be submitted based on the lowest cost (excluding VAT and reserve), as this is the sole evaluation criterion.
  • The bid's cost must be presented by filling out the cost lists (HD IV Annex 1 Part 1 and Part 2), entering unit prices and total costs for all items.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Fill in and submit the actual European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) electronically in the e-procurement environment.
  • Submit confirmations of acceptance of the tender conditions.
  • Submit authorization for the representative in case of a joint bid.
  • Define business secrets within the bid.
  • Provide information about first-tier subcontractors.
  • Fill in and submit the cost list (HD IV Annex 1 Part 1) for gravel road surfacing work items in Jõgeva and Tartu counties, entering unit prices and total costs.
  • Fill in and submit the cost list (HD IV Annex 1 Part 2) for gravel road surfacing work items in Põlva, Võru, and Valga counties, entering unit prices and total costs.
  • The submission deadline is 2026-02-16 at 09:00:00.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapis
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded304659_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingi...30.2 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the grounds for disqualifying first-tier subcontractors during the contract performance phase, focusing on criminal convictions such as fraud and money laundering, and requires the tenderer to provide relevant information about their first-tier subcontractors.
PDF
Vastavustingimused
Vastavusdeklaratsioon304659_vastavustingimused.pdf11.7 KB
Summary:
This document requires bidders to confirm agreement with tender conditions, provide details for joint bids including representative authorization, declare any business secrets, and affirm that offered goods are not subject to international sanctions.
XLS
HD IV -1 Kululoend
Esitamise VormidHD IV Lisa 1 Kululoend (Osa 1).xlsx27.3 KB
Summary:
To submit a bid, this cost list must be completed by entering unit prices and costs for various articles related to gravel road surface construction works in Jõgeva and Tartu counties.
XLS
HD IV- 2 Kululoend
Esitamise VormidHD IV Lisa 1 Kululoend (Osa 2).xlsx26.5 KB
Summary:
This document is a cost list detailing payment items for works and services related to the construction of gravel road surfaces in Jõgeva, Tartu, Põlva, Võru, and Valga counties, where the bidder must provide unit prices and costs.
PDF
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad
Hindamiskriteeriumid304659_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf5.1 KB
Summary:
This document specifies that bids for constructing dust-free surfaces on gravel roads in Jõgeva, Tartu, Põlva, Võru, and Valga counties will be evaluated exclusively based on the lowest submitted cost (excluding VAT and reserve).
PDF
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded304659_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitusteg...81.3 KB
Summary:
This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected format for bidder qualification and exclusion grounds, but it is not for submission as the actual ESPD must be completed electronically.
DOC
HD II Hankelepingu projekt
Lepingu MallHD II Hankelepingu projekt.docx64.4 KB
Summary:
This document is a draft road construction contract outlining the works for building road surfaces on gravel roads in Jõgeva, Tartu, Põlva, Võru, and Valga counties in 2026, including contract terms and a list of appendices.
DOC
Riigihanke alusdokument
Hanke TingimusedRiigihanke alusdokument .docx35.2 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the general administrative rules, contact details, communication channels, the contracting authority's rationale for not dividing the tender into parts, and general bidder participation conditions, referring to the e-procurement environment for specific qualification and exclusion criteria.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

65
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured but contains significant data inconsistencies and omissions that impact legal compliance and overall clarity. While many aspects are positive, critical information gaps and contradictions need addressing.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance60/100

The tender suffers from an incorrect CPV code (9290 'Miscellaneous services' instead of a construction-related code for road building) and a missing NUTS code, which are significant legal compliance issues. There's also ambiguity regarding the procedure type (negotiation allowed vs. lowest cost criterion).

Incorrect CPV code (9290 for services instead of construction)
Missing NUTS code
Clarity75/100

The project description and AI-extracted requirements are clear. However, the inability to analyze crucial technical specifications and contract appendices (due to .zip file format) and the procedural contradictions reduce overall clarity for potential bidders.

Crucial technical specifications and contract appendices in unanalyzed .zip files
Contradiction between 'Negotiation Allowed' and 'Lowest Cost' evaluation
Completeness60/100

While basic information is present, the tender is incomplete due to the inability to analyze critical documents (technical specifications, contract appendices, forms) provided as .zip files. The NUTS code is missing, and the specific contract duration for the works is not explicitly stated.

Crucial documents (.zip files) unanalyzed, impacting full content assessment
Missing NUTS code
Fairness85/100

The tender demonstrates good fairness with disclosed value, objective 'lowest cost' evaluation criteria, and enabled e-procurement. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company, and deadlines are reasonable.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is well-supported, enhancing practicality. However, the absence of an explicit contract start date and the specific duration for the works, along with no direct document URL (beyond the e-procurement portal), slightly reduce the practicality score.

Contract start date not explicitly stated
Specific duration for the works not explicitly stated
Data Consistency50/100

This category presents significant issues. There are direct contradictions regarding the CPV code, whether negotiation is allowed versus the sole 'lowest cost' evaluation criterion, and whether the tender is 'Divided into Parts' versus the stated 'rationale for not dividing the tender into parts'.

Inconsistent CPV code for the nature of work
Contradiction: 'Negotiation Allowed' vs. 'Lowest Cost' evaluation criterion
Sustainability50/100

The tender explicitly mentions 'Green Procurement', which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks any stated focus on social criteria or innovation, and it is not indicated as EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.

No explicit social criteria mentioned
No explicit innovation focus mentioned

Strengths

Clear project description and geographical scope
Estimated value is disclosed and not classified
Electronic submission and e-procurement are enabled
Green procurement is explicitly stated
Evaluation criterion (lowest cost) is transparently defined

Concerns

Incorrect CPV code (9290 'Miscellaneous services' for road construction)
Significant data inconsistencies (e.g., 'Negotiation Allowed' vs. 'Lowest Cost', 'Divided into Parts' vs. 'not dividing')
Crucial tender documents (.zip files for technical specifications, contract appendices, forms) are not analyzed, impacting completeness and clarity
Missing NUTS code for a tender of this value and scope
Contract duration for the works is not explicitly stated

Recommendations

1. Correct the CPV code to accurately reflect road construction works.
2. Resolve all data inconsistencies, especially regarding the procurement procedure type and the division into parts.
3. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in an accessible and analyzable format, or provide comprehensive summaries for them.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
65/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes