Owner Supervision Service for the Design and Construction Works of Põltsamaa Municipality's Nearly Zero-Energy Sports and Service Building and Mountain Sports Slopes

This tender for owner supervision services is generally well-structured and transparent, particularly regarding its clear evaluation criteria and fair process. However, the inability to access detailed content of key project documents for analysis and the lack of explicit sustainability criteria for the service provider are notable areas for improvement.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type (LM) and CPV codes, and indicates EU funding, suggesting compliance with relevant regulations. The use of ESPD is a good practice. However, the specific mandatory exclusion grounds are not detailed in the AI summary due to XML format, which, while not a tender flaw, means full visibility of these critical legal aspects is not available in the provided text.

The tender description is clear, and the evaluation criteria are exceptionally well-defined as solely based on the lowest price. Requirements are structured and generally understandable, with principles of equivalence noted.

While all basic information, financial details, and deadlines are present, the AI's inability to process key project documents (architectural, interior design, infrastructure projects in .zip and .asice formats) means a significant portion of the technical context for the supervision service is not accessible for this analysis. This limits the assessment of the tender's overall completeness from the provided data.

The tender demonstrates high fairness with full document access (implied), disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, objective and transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price), and enabled e-procurement. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company.

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, enhancing practicality. Financing information and contract duration are clearly specified. The absence of an explicit contract start date is common but could be a minor point for planning.

All key fields are populated, and there are no detected suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent throughout the provided information.

While the underlying project (near-zero energy building) is inherently sustainable, the tender for the owner supervision service itself does not explicitly include green procurement, social, or innovation criteria for the service provider. The EU funding is a positive but doesn't compensate for the lack of specific sustainability requirements for the service.