BIM-based Reconstruction of National Road 34 Kiviõli - Varja Section km 5.017-8.712 and Varja Intersection

This tender presents a generally fair and legally compliant process, but suffers from significant clarity and completeness issues due to contradictory evaluation criteria and unanalyzed key documents, hindering a full assessment of its quality.

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with reasonable submission deadlines (28 days), clear CPV codes, and the use of ESPD for exclusion and qualification criteria, aligning with EU/national regulations. The procedure type is defined, although specific codes are marked N/A.

While the general description and AI-extracted requirements are clear, there is a significant contradiction: 'Procurement Characteristics' lists 'relative_weighting' for evaluation, but the 'Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad' document explicitly states evaluation is '100% based on cost'. This ambiguity is a major concern for bidders. Furthermore, several key technical documents are in .zip format, preventing AI analysis and potentially obscuring further clarity issues.

Basic information, financial details, and timeline are largely complete. However, the location information 'Täpne piirkond määramata' (Exact region undefined) is a minor gap for a road reconstruction project. More critically, several essential documents (e.g., HD I Vormid, HD III Tehniline kirjeldus, HD II Hankelepingu projekti lisad) are provided as .zip or .xml files, meaning their content could not be fully analyzed, which significantly limits the assessment of the overall completeness of information available to bidders.

The tender appears fair, with full document access implied, disclosed estimated value, and reasonable deadlines for preparation. Evaluation criteria are objective (100% cost-based), and e-procurement is enabled for equal access. Requirements for road reconstruction and BIM capability seem generic and not tailored to a specific company.

Electronic submission is supported, which is practical. However, specific document URLs are not provided, only a general e-procurement portal link. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, only the duration. Financing information is limited to the estimated value, without further details on funding sources or payment schedules.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, the significant contradiction between 'relative_weighting' in procurement characteristics and '100% based on cost' in the evaluation criteria document represents a critical data inconsistency that needs immediate clarification.

The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive aspect. However, there is no explicit mention of social aspects or a broader innovation focus beyond BIM as a technical requirement. The project is not indicated as EU funded.