Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login16 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
6 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines tenderer requirements concerning Russian sanctions, power of attorney for joint tenders, and the declaration of business secrets, requiring tenderers to provide corresponding confirmations and explanations.
This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the Tartu Veeriku school and sports hall design tender, covering cost (60%), portfolio quality (30%), and the designer's experience in school building projects (10%).
This document is an explanatory guide to the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), detailing the exclusion grounds and qualification conditions for the Tartu Veeriku school and sports hall design tender, which bidders must complete electronically.
This document is a subordination agreement regulating the cooperation and relationships between the designer and the builder of Tartu Veeriku School with the client during the preparation of the work project, to ensure a high-quality final outcome.
This document is a draft procurement contract for the design services of the Tartu Veeriku school and sports hall, detailing special conditions, scope of work, permit responsibilities, timelines, and financial terms.
This document provides additional information regarding the tender for the design of Tartu Veeriku school and sports hall, offering further clarifications and context to bidders.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This is a well-structured and transparent tender for design services, demonstrating strong legal compliance and fairness. While comprehensive in its requirements and evaluation, it lacks explicit sustainability or social considerations.
The tender demonstrates strong legal compliance, with a clearly defined procedure, appropriate CPV codes, and explicit checks for Russia sanctions and ESPD exclusion grounds. The submission deadline of 32 days is reasonable, and no disputes or suspensions are noted.
The tender description is clear and unambiguous, and the AI-extracted requirements are well-categorized and understandable. Evaluation criteria are clearly specified with relative weightings, and performance conditions are referenced to a specific document.
All essential basic information, financial details, timeline, and classification are provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are well-defined. While two documents (XML/ZIP) were not AI-analyzed, their presence indicates a comprehensive tender package.
The tender exhibits high fairness with a disclosed estimated value, reasonable submission deadlines, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria. E-procurement is enabled, and the qualification requirements, such as experience in designing school buildings, appear generic and not tailored to a specific company.
Electronic submission is fully supported, enhancing practicality for bidders. The contract duration and financing information are specified or referenced. However, an explicit contract start date is not provided, and direct document URLs are not listed in the basic information.
All key fields are populated, and the dates provided for the timeline are logical and consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating high data integrity.
The tender does not explicitly include criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles into the procurement process.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required