Estonia, Estonia
€150,000
February 16, 2026 at 11:00
Services
304442
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
This tender for audit services is well-structured and comprehensive in its documentation, but raises significant concerns regarding fairness due to highly restrictive qualification requirements that may limit competition.
The tender defines the procedure type (simplified, LM) and CPV codes correctly. Deadlines are reasonable, and there are no detected disputes or suspensions. The tender appears to comply with national procurement regulations for its value and scope.
The description of the service and the contract duration, including renewal options, is clear. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as 100% price-based. AI-extracted requirements and supporting documents provide good detail, though performance conditions are generally referenced to the full documents.
All essential basic information, financial details, timeline, and location are provided. The tender includes 11 documents with summaries, comprehensively defining requirements, qualification conditions, and evaluation criteria.
While the estimated value is disclosed and e-procurement is enabled, several requirements are overly restrictive. The demand for the signatory to hold a 'public sector sworn auditor qualification' and to have audited 'at least one state-owned company within the last 60 months' is highly specific. Additionally, high financial thresholds for reference contracts (5M EUR sales revenue, 3.5M EUR assets) for a 150,000 EUR simplified procedure may disproportionately limit competition.
Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, enhancing practicality. The contract duration is clearly specified. However, the exact contract start date is not explicitly stated, and financing conditions beyond the estimated value are generic.
Most key fields are populated consistently, and dates are logical. The contract duration (60 months) aligns with the initial and renewal periods described. A minor inconsistency exists with 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed estimated value, but the estimate itself is provided.
The tender explicitly lacks any green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes