Vidzeme, Latvia
Not disclosed
February 09, 2026 at 10:30
Other
164067
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
This tender demonstrates good intent with strong sustainability aspects but is hampered by significant issues regarding transparency, document access, and data consistency, which could hinder fair competition.
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes appropriately. Deadlines are reasonable. However, the undisclosed estimated value (despite not being classified) and restricted document access raise legal compliance concerns regarding transparency and equal access to information.
The description and AI-extracted requirements are generally clear and refer to specific documents. Performance conditions are well-referenced. However, the discrepancy between the 'missing evaluation criteria' flag and the document summaries mentioning them indicates a potential lack of prominent or easily accessible criteria, impacting overall clarity.
Basic information, deadlines, duration, and location are provided. All required documents are listed. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the ambiguity surrounding the evaluation criteria reduce the completeness of the tender information.
Restricted document access and the undisclosed estimated value are significant fairness concerns, limiting bidders' ability to properly assess the opportunity and prepare bids. While e-procurement is indicated, the 'no e-submission' flag creates confusion, potentially impacting equal access.
The tender specifies a clear contract duration and location. However, restricted document access is a major practical impediment for potential bidders. The lack of a specific contract start date and undisclosed financing details also reduce practicality.
Several inconsistencies are present: 'E-Procurement' characteristic versus 'No e-submission' in automated checks; 'Missing evaluation criteria' flag versus document summaries mentioning them; and incorrect automated check results for sustainability aspects (e.g., 'Not green procurement' for zero-emission vehicles). The undisclosed value is also a data gap.
This tender scores highly on sustainability. It explicitly targets 'zero-emission vehicles' (green procurement) and includes 'special adaptations for persons with disabilities' (social aspects). Being EU-funded also suggests adherence to higher sustainability standards. The automated check results for sustainability are incorrect.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes