Tenders

Design and construction of Väimela Health Centre parking lot

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
304351
Value
€80,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 03, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of construction works.100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 03, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 02, 2026

Tender Opening

March 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€80,000
Duration
5 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
69
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The aim of the contracting authority is to reconstruct and expand the parking lot of the Väimela Health Centre, to make the external space of the building compliant with accessibility requirements, and to make its use as comfortable as possible for visitors (including users with special needs).
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--The bid must be submitted according to the instructions for the open procurement procedure.
--The bid cost must be presented according to the specified structure.
--The bid must be submitted using the provided cost form (Maksumuse vorm_Väimela TK parkla.xlsx), specifying unit prices and total cost for different work stages.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tenderer and its first-tier subcontractors must not have grounds for exclusion related to criminal offenses or other ethical violations as specified in the subcontractor control conditions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Joint tenderers must submit a power of attorney.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The design and construction of the parking lot must ensure universal accessibility, considering the needs of people with various disabilities and factors affecting accessibility.
--The bid must comply with the technical requirements and specifications for the design and construction of the Väimela Health Centre parking lot.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No explicit financial capability requirements (e.g., turnover, financial ratios) for the bidder are stated in the document summaries.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
304351_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the conditions for controlling subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on exclusion grounds for first-tier subcontractors related to criminal offenses and other ethical violations, and requires the tenderer to provide answers regarding these.

VastavustingimusedPDF
304351_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.4 KB

This document details tender compliance conditions, including requirements for joint bids, the mandatory structure for submitting tender costs, and general principles for tender submission and equivalence.

HD Lisa 1_Maksumuse vormXLS
Maksumuse vorm_Väimela TK parkla.xlsx -- 16.9 KB

This is a cost form for submitting a tender for the design and construction of the Väimela Health Centre parking lot, requiring bidders to specify unit prices and total costs for various work stages.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304351_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.2 KB

This document specifies that bids for the design and construction of Väimela Health Center's parking lot will be evaluated solely based on the total cost of construction works, with the lowest-priced bid receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304351_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 65.3 KB

This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlining the qualification requirements and exclusion grounds for the Väimela Health Center parking lot design and construction tender, intended for review, not for submission.

Hankedokument (HD)DOC
Hankedokument HD- Väimela Tervisekeskuse park... -- 37.8 KB

This is the tender document for Võru Rural Municipality Government's public procurement "Design and Construction of Väimela Health Center Parking Lot," providing instructions for preparing a bid in an open tender procedure.

HD Lisa 2-Tehniline kirjeldus (TK)DOC
Tehniline kirjeldus (TK)_Väimela TK parkla.do... -- 26.8 KB

This document outlines the technical requirements and specifications for the design and construction of the Väimela Health Center parking lot.

TK Lisa 3 - ligipääsetavuse hinnangPDF
TK Lisa 3 - ligipääsetavuse hinnang.pdf -- 1.7 MB

This document is an accessibility assessment for Väimela Health Centre, detailing the needs of people with various disabilities and factors affecting accessibility to ensure universal access in the design and construction of the parking lot.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

69
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a strong focus on accessibility. However, a critical inconsistency in the stated evaluation criteria significantly impacts its clarity and data consistency.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears largely compliant with legal requirements, including reasonable deadlines and proper CPV codes. The 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic for an 'Open Procedure' is a minor ambiguity that could warrant clarification.

'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic for an 'Open Procedure' (Type A) is unusual and potentially ambiguous.
Clarity60/100

While the project description and individual requirements are clear, there is a direct contradiction between the stated 'relative_weighting' evaluation criteria in the characteristics and the document specifying 'solely based on total cost'. This is a significant clarity issue.

Direct contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price only).
Completeness70/100

Most essential information is provided, including basic details, value, and duration. However, the lack of explicit financial capability requirements for bidders and the inability to analyze key technical and contractual documents (due to file formats) represent minor gaps.

No explicit financial capability requirements for bidders.
Key technical and contractual documents (e.g., draft contract, detailed project plans) are in unanalyzed .zip/.png formats, limiting full content assessment.
Fairness80/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and e-procurement. The evaluation criteria, if 'lowest price only', are objective, though the contradiction noted under clarity slightly impacts transparency.

Contradiction in evaluation criteria slightly impacts transparency.
Practicality75/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the duration is clearly specified. While a contract start date isn't explicit, the overall process appears practical. Financing conditions are mentioned but not fully detailed.

Financing conditions are mentioned but lack full detail.
Contract start date is not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency50/100

There is a critical inconsistency regarding the evaluation criteria, with 'relative_weighting' stated in characteristics but 'lowest price only' in the evaluation document. This is a major flaw in data consistency.

Critical contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price only).
Inconsistency between 'Open Procedure' and 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic.
Sustainability60/100

The tender includes a strong social aspect by emphasizing universal accessibility for people with disabilities. However, it lacks explicit green procurement or innovation-focused criteria, as noted by automated checks.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
No specific innovation focus.

Strengths

Clear project description and objectives, including universal accessibility.
Comprehensive set of supporting documents provided.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Value disclosed and reasonable submission deadline.
Strong social aspect through accessibility requirements.

Concerns

Critical contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price only).
Lack of explicit financial capability requirements for bidders.
Key technical and contractual documents are in unanalyzed formats (.zip, .png).
Ambiguity regarding 'Negotiation Allowed' in an 'Open Procedure'.
Absence of explicit green procurement or innovation criteria.

Recommendations

1. Immediately clarify and correct the contradictory statements regarding evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and avoid bidder confusion.
2. Consider adding explicit financial capability requirements to mitigate risks for a construction project.
3. Provide summaries or accessible formats for key technical and contractual documents to enhance transparency and completeness.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline