Backup solution extension

This tender is generally well-structured with clear requirements and transparent evaluation criteria, promoting fair competition. However, minor ambiguities and a lack of explicit sustainability considerations slightly detract from an otherwise robust procurement process.

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with reasonable submission deadlines and the use of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD). No disputes or suspensions are noted. However, the procedure type code being 'N/A' introduces a minor ambiguity.

The tender description is clear, and requirements are well-structured and understandable, supported by detailed technical specifications and explicit evaluation criteria based solely on total cost. Performance conditions are referenced to the full procurement documents.

Most essential information, including title, organization, financial details, and duration, is provided. All required documents appear to be attached. However, the location information in the main fields is generic ('Täpsem piirkond määramata') despite the description specifying Harjumaa, and the contract start date is explicitly stated as indicative.

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, a very reasonable submission deadline, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria based on the lowest price. The allowance for equivalent solutions effectively mitigates potential concerns about tailoring requirements for an existing system.

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, enhancing accessibility. However, the indicative nature of the contract start date poses a practical challenge for bidders' resource planning. Financing conditions are also referenced to the full documents rather than being immediately available.

Key fields are largely populated, and dates are logical and consistent. Minor inconsistencies exist with the procedure type code (N/A) and the general location field versus the detailed description, but these are not critical.

The tender does not explicitly include green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, nor is it EU-funded. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives.