Tallinn, Niine põik 8 Apartment Association

This tender demonstrates good overall quality, adhering to many public procurement principles, but contains a significant contradiction in its evaluation criteria. The project's inherent green nature is a strength, though explicit social and innovation criteria are absent.

The tender, while explicitly stating it is not a public procurement under the Public Procurement Act, adopts many best practices for publicly funded projects, including reasonable deadlines and correct CPV codes. However, the internal contradiction regarding evaluation criteria is a flaw in its adherence to its own stated rules.

The project description and most requirements are clear and well-documented. However, the direct contradiction between 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' and 'total cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion (100%)' creates significant ambiguity for bidders.

All essential basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided. Requirements and criteria are defined. However, the inability to analyze crucial documents like 'Projekt' and 'Lepingu projekt.rtf' due to unsupported formats limits a full assessment of technical and contractual completeness.

The tender offers full document access, discloses the estimated value, provides reasonable deadlines, and supports e-procurement. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. While the evaluation criteria contradiction is a concern, the specific document clarifying 100% price mitigates its impact on objectivity.

Electronic submission via RHR is supported, and financing information and contract duration are clearly specified. Minor improvements could include providing explicit document URLs and a specific contract start date.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, the direct contradiction between 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' and 'total cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion (100%)' represents a significant data inconsistency.

The core purpose of the project, 'energy efficiency reconstruction works for apartment buildings,' is inherently a strong green procurement aspect. However, the tender does not explicitly include social or innovation criteria.