Pre-planting ground preparation with mounding in the Southwest, Southeast, and Northeast regions 2026-2029

This tender for pre-planting ground preparation services is well-structured and transparent, particularly benefiting from its division into parts and clear financial details. While strong on legal compliance and fairness, there are minor areas for improvement in explicitly detailing contract start dates and broadening sustainability aspects beyond green procurement.

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, with reasonable submission deadlines, clear CPV codes, and adherence to EU standards like ESPD and WTO/GPA. The procedure type 'A' combined with 'Negotiation Allowed' could benefit from further clarification on the specific national procedure type, but it generally aligns with procurement principles.

The tender description is clear and unambiguous, and requirements are well-documented and understandable through the AI-extracted categories and supporting documents. Evaluation criteria are specified in a dedicated document, despite an automated flag suggesting otherwise, indicating good clarity in the documentation.

All essential information, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines, is provided. Contract duration (2026-2029) and location (RMK Southwest, Southeast, Northeast regions) are clearly specified within the tender documents, addressing automated flags. All 10 documents are attached and summarized, ensuring comprehensive information access.

Fairness is a strong aspect, with full document access, disclosed value, and reasonable deadlines. The tender's characteristic of being 'Divided into Parts' and the intention to sign 'separate framework agreements' for each equipment set significantly enhance fairness, allowing a broader range of bidders to participate. Evaluation criteria are objective, focusing on price coefficient.

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, which is highly practical. While the service duration is clear (2026-2029), an explicit contract start date is not provided, only the possibility of its adjustment. The procurement portal URL is given, implying document access.

Data consistency is high, with all key fields populated and no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical and consistent across the tender information. Minor discrepancies flagged by automated checks were resolved by referring to the detailed document content.

The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive step towards sustainability. However, there is no explicit mention of social criteria or innovation focus, and it is not EU funded, limiting its overall sustainability scope.