Taxi Service

This tender for taxi and transfer services is well-structured and legally compliant, with clear requirements and consistent data. However, the stringent eligibility criteria, particularly the requirement for a fleet of at least 50 vehicles, significantly raise concerns about fairness and potential market restriction.

The tender demonstrates strong legal compliance with reasonable submission deadlines, a clearly defined open procedure, appropriate CPV codes, and no detected disputes. The use of the ESPD further confirms adherence to EU and national procurement regulations.

The tender documentation is highly clear and unambiguous. The description of services, detailed AI-extracted requirements, specified evaluation criteria (lowest price), and clear performance conditions ensure that potential bidders can easily understand the scope and expectations.

The tender provides comprehensive information, including all basic details, financial figures, and a clear timeline. A full set of 9 documents is attached, covering all necessary aspects from technical specifications to submission forms. The only minor ambiguity is the unspecified exact location within Estonia.

While the tender supports e-procurement and has objective evaluation criteria, the eligibility requirement for a taxi fleet of at least 50 vehicles and vehicles not older than 5 years is exceptionally stringent. This significantly limits competition, potentially tailoring the tender to a very small number of large operators and raising serious concerns about market access and equal opportunity.

The tender is practical, supporting electronic submission and providing a clear URL for the e-procurement portal. Key dates, including the contract start date and duration, are explicitly stated, aiding bidder planning.

All key fields are populated, and there are no detected suspensions or disputes. The dates are logical and sequential, and the estimated value is consistent with the maximum value for the framework agreement, indicating robust data integrity.

The tender lacks any explicit criteria or considerations for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability goals into the procurement process.