KUMU repair works

This tender for KUMU renovation works is generally well-documented with clear technical requirements and evaluation criteria, but faces concerns regarding the clarity of its procurement procedure type and the practical implications of its mandatory site visit requirement.

The tender adheres to national regulations, including the use of ESPD and the 'or equivalent' clause. However, the undefined procedure type and code ('E' and 'A' with N/A codes) are significant deficiencies, making it difficult to ascertain full procedural compliance. The mandatory site visit is compliant with RHS § 111 lg 6.

The tender documents are comprehensive and clearly detail the scope of work, technical specifications, and submission requirements. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as the lowest price, contradicting the automated check. The AI-extracted requirements are also clear and well-structured.

While the tender provides extensive documentation, including detailed technical specifications and draft contracts, the initial basic information lacks a NUTS code and a clear, explicit contract duration. However, the overall package is robust.

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price). E-procurement is enabled. However, the mandatory site visit, while legally compliant, poses a practical barrier that could limit participation, especially for distant or smaller bidders, thus slightly impacting overall fairness.

Electronic submission is supported, which is practical. However, the mandatory site visit requiring physical presence and coordination with a contact person adds a notable practical hurdle for bidders. The absence of an explicit contract start date in the basic information is a minor inconvenience.

There are inconsistencies in the basic information, particularly with the undefined procedure type and code, which conflicts with the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic. The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag is contradictory to the explicitly stated estimated value. The NUTS code is also missing.

The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive step towards sustainability. However, it lacks explicit mention of social aspects or an innovation focus, limiting its overall sustainability profile.