Foodstuffs 2

This tender for foodstuffs demonstrates good clarity and fairness with detailed requirements and transparent evaluation criteria, but is hampered by an incorrect CPV code and some missing basic information.

The tender provides reasonable submission deadlines and utilizes standard documents like the ESPD, indicating general compliance. However, the assigned CPV code '671' is not a standard 8-digit code, which is a significant legal and classification inaccuracy.

The description of the goods, technical requirements, and submission instructions are clear and well-documented. Evaluation criteria (98% cost, 2% environmental) are explicitly stated in Document 4, contradicting the automated flag.

Most essential information, including title, organization, value, and deadlines, is provided. However, the NUTS code is missing, and the contract duration is not explicitly stated in the basic tender information, requiring bidders to consult the framework agreements.

The tender offers full document access, discloses the estimated value, and provides a reasonable deadline for preparation. Evaluation criteria are objective and transparent, and e-procurement is enabled, ensuring equal access. Requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company.

Electronic submission is supported, enhancing practicality. However, the absence of an explicit contract start date and duration in the basic information means bidders must delve into the attached framework agreements for these crucial details.

Key dates are logical and sequential, and financial figures (estimated value vs. maximum value) are consistent. The primary inconsistency lies with the non-standard CPV code.

The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic and allocates 2% of evaluation weight to environmental and climate change impact reduction goals, which is a positive step. However, it lacks explicit social criteria or an innovation focus.