Ordering of securities register service for the Ministry of Finance

This tender for securities register services is well-documented with clear requirements and a transparent evaluation process, but exhibits minor data inconsistencies and lacks explicit sustainability criteria. The highly specialized nature of the service inherently limits competition, which is reflected in the fairness assessment.

The tender generally complies with procurement regulations, utilizing ESPD and referencing national law for concession agreements. However, the 'Type' and 'Procedure' codes are listed as N/A, and the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicts the disclosed estimated value, indicating minor disclosure inconsistencies.

The tender description is clear, and requirements are well-documented across multiple attachments, including technical specifications, draft contracts, and evaluation criteria. AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and easy to understand, ensuring bidders have sufficient information.

All essential basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are specified. A comprehensive set of 8 documents is provided, detailing requirements, criteria, and contractual terms. The only minor omission is the exact region for location information.

The tender offers full document access, discloses the estimated value, and provides a reasonable submission deadline (58 days). Evaluation criteria are objective (lowest price receives maximum points), and e-procurement is enabled. However, the requirement for 'service continuity until at least the end of 2030' and the highly regulated nature of securities register services (EVKS § 25 lg 1) inherently limit the pool of eligible bidders, though this is likely justifiable for such a critical service.

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, enhancing accessibility. The contract duration is clearly specified, and the start date is inferable from the financial requirements (2027-2030). While a direct document URL isn't provided, access is assumed via the e-procurement system.

Key fields are mostly populated, and dates are logical. However, there's a direct contradiction between 'Value Classified: Yes' and the disclosed estimated value. Additionally, 'Type' and 'Procedure' codes are N/A, and 'Over Sum Limit: No' for a 12M EUR concession is questionable, even with different concession thresholds.

The tender does not explicitly include criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.