Tenders

Skoone Inviting Green Space Landscape Architecture Competition

Open
Deadline
6 days left
March 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
303410
Value
€250,000
Location
Estonia
Published
December 08, 2025
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Jury decision of the idea competition100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

December 08, 2025

Deadline for Questions

March 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 09, 2026

Tender Opening

March 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€250,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
76
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The aim of the open, one-stage idea competition is to create a landscape architectural concept for a modern, inviting green space in the moat area of the Skoone bastion, which offers schools in the city center the opportunity to conduct movement education classes in the form of a park-like green area, as well as high-quality public outdoor space for all city residents and visitors for leisure and movement activities.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (10)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS10
--Submit a concept design that adheres to the competition brief, purpose, and general task.
--The design proposal must demonstrate quality, functionality, environmental friendliness, and cost-effectiveness.
--The concept design must adhere to mandatory submission conditions, including language requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as detailed in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) conditions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must meet the qualification requirements outlined in the ESPD conditions.
--Joint participants must designate a common representative.
--Joint participants must confirm joint and several liability for the implementation of the design proposal.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Key personnel (e.g., project manager, architect, landscape architect, constructor) must meet the specific professional level and competence required for each role for the design contract.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly mentioned in the provided summaries.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
303410_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 13.4 KB

This document outlines the mandatory submission conditions for the landscape architecture competition's concept design, emphasizing language, anonymity, non-encryption, and intellectual property rights requirements that bidders must confirm.

NimekaartDOC
Vorm A_Nimekaart.docx -- 19.3 KB

This form collects essential participant identification details, including company information, author names, and prize payment preferences, to be submitted with the tender.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
303410_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.9 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the landscape architecture idea competition, where the jury's decision will be based on the design proposal's adherence to the brief, quality, functionality, environmental friendliness, and cost-effectiveness.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
303410_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 38.6 KB

This document is an explanatory guide to the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) conditions, detailing the contracting authority's qualification requirements and exclusion grounds for the Skoone green space landscape architecture competition, but it is not to be filled out directly.

Lähteülesanne koos lisadegaDOC
Lähteülesanne_SkooneLiikumaKutsuvRoheruum.doc... -- 4.3 MB

This document serves as the brief for the Skoone inviting green space landscape architecture competition, outlining its purpose and general task.

Tööde etapid ja tähtajadDOC
Lisa 3_1 Tööde etapid ja tähtajad.docx -- 26.3 KB

This document outlines the project's work stages, deadlines, required studies, sketch preparation and submission, and corresponding payment schedules for the landscape architecture competition.

Projekteerimistööde lepingDOC
Projekteerimistööde leping 0512.docx -- 66.9 KB

This document outlines the specific qualification requirements for key personnel (project manager, architect, landscape architect, constructor, etc.) mandated for the design contract, detailing the required professional level and competence for each role.

Ideekonkursi korraldamise kordDOC
RHAD_Skoone_.docx -- 52.7 KB

This document outlines the general organizational terms for the Skoone inspiring green space landscape architecture idea competition, aiming to conclude a design contract with the winner and detailing participant obligations.

Ühisosalejate volikiriDOC
Vorm B_Ühisosalejate volikiri.docx -- 19.3 KB

This form is a power of attorney for joint participants, designating a common representative for participation in the landscape architecture competition and confirming joint and several liability for the implementation of the design proposal.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

76
Good

Tender Quality Score

This is a well-structured idea competition for landscape architecture services, demonstrating good clarity and fairness with comprehensive documentation. Minor improvements could enhance formal data completeness and explicit detail on contract duration.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears compliant with national regulations, defining the procedure type as an idea competition and providing a reasonable submission period. The use of 'IK' for procedure type is understood in the local context, though standard classification codes are not fully detailed. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

Clarity80/100

The tender description is clear, and requirements are well-documented across multiple attachments, including an ESPD explanatory guide and specific submission conditions. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated, enhancing transparency for bidders.

Completeness70/100

Most essential information, such as title, organization, value, and deadlines, is provided. However, a formal NUTS code for location is missing, and while work stages are detailed, a single explicit contract duration field for the design services is not present. Financial requirements for bidders are not explicitly mentioned.

Missing formal NUTS code.
Contract duration not explicitly stated as a single field.
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, objective and transparent evaluation criteria, and support for e-procurement and electronic submission. Requirements for key personnel are standard for the profession and do not appear tailored to a specific company.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, which is practical. However, an explicit contract start date is not provided, and the duration is detailed through work stages rather than a single field. Specific financing information beyond the estimated value and contracting authority is not available.

No explicit contract start date.
Specific financing information beyond the organization is not detailed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields are largely populated, and dates are logical and consistent. No suspensions or disputes are reported, indicating good data integrity.

Sustainability70/100

The tender explicitly states 'Green Procurement' and the project's description strongly emphasizes creating a 'movement-inviting green space' with social benefits for residents and schools. While not EU funded, it demonstrates a clear commitment to environmental and social aspects.

Strengths

Comprehensive and clear documentation.
Transparent and objective evaluation criteria.
Reasonable submission deadline for complex design work.
Explicitly green procurement with strong social aspects.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.

Concerns

Missing formal NUTS code for geographical clarity.
Contract duration for the design services is not explicitly stated as a single field.
No explicit financial requirements for bidders.
Some document formats (.xml, .asice) were not analyzable by AI.
Specific funding source details beyond the organization are not specified.

Recommendations

1. Include the formal NUTS code to enhance geographical clarity and data completeness.
2. Clearly state the estimated contract duration for the design services in a dedicated field.
3. Provide explicit financial requirements for bidders, if any, or clarify their absence.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline