Design and construction works for Mustla motor engineering club premises

This tender is well-structured and comprehensive in its documentation, offering clear requirements and a fair process. However, a critical misclassification of the CPV code significantly impacts its legal compliance and potential visibility, while sustainability aspects are entirely absent.

The tender provides reasonable deadlines and clearly defines the procedure type. Mandatory disclosure requirements are met, and there are no detected disputes or suspensions. However, the assignment of CPV code 5879 (Leisure, sport, culture, lodging and restaurant services) for design and construction works is a significant misclassification, as this CPV is for services, not construction works. This can severely impact the tender's visibility to relevant bidders and its compliance with procurement regulations.

The tender description is clear and unambiguous, detailing the scope of design and construction works. Requirements, including eligibility, technical, financial, and submission criteria, are well-documented and understandable through the AI-extracted information and supporting documents. Evaluation criteria are clearly specified as the lowest total cost receiving maximum points, clarifying the 'relative_weighting' characteristic.

All basic information, including title, reference, organization, and liable person, is provided. Key financial details, timeline (deadlines, value, duration), and location information are clearly specified. The tender includes a comprehensive set of 7 documents, covering all necessary aspects from technical specifications to the draft contract, ensuring all requirements and criteria are defined.

The tender demonstrates a high level of fairness with full document access, disclosed estimated value, and reasonable deadlines for preparation. Evaluation criteria based on the lowest total cost are objective and transparent. Electronic submission and e-procurement are enabled, ensuring equal access. Requirements appear generic and are not tailored to a specific company; the decision not to divide the tender is reasonably justified for a combined design and build project of this scope.

Electronic submission is fully supported, enhancing practicality for bidders. The contract duration is clearly specified as 5 months. While a direct document URL is not explicitly provided in the summary, it is implied by the e-procurement system. The exact contract start date is not stated, only the duration, which is a minor omission.

All key fields across the basic, financial, timeline, and classification sections are populated. There are no detected suspensions or disputes, and all dates (reveal, submission, opening) are logical and consistent, contributing to high data integrity.

The tender explicitly lacks any focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, as confirmed by automated checks. It is also not EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards. This indicates a complete absence of sustainability considerations in the procurement process.