Finding an operator for the Maritime Museum shop

This tender for a museum shop operator is well-structured and comprehensive, providing clear requirements and evaluation criteria, ensuring a fair and transparent process. While strong in most areas, it could enhance its sustainability focus by explicitly integrating social and innovation aspects.

The tender defines its procedure type (KE, likely a concession with negotiation) and uses appropriate CPV codes. The use of ESPD and clear documentation indicates compliance with national and EU procurement regulations. No disputes or suspensions are reported.

The tender excels in clarity, with detailed AI-extracted requirements, comprehensive supporting documents like the scope of work and service standards, and a very clear evaluation methodology (40% price, 60% quality).

All essential information, including title, reference, organization, financial details, timeline, and location, is provided. A full set of 14 documents, including all necessary forms and contract drafts, ensures high completeness.

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed estimated value, reasonable preparation time, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria. Requirements are generic and do not appear tailored to a specific company.

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, which enhances accessibility. The contract duration is clearly specified, and the financial model (percentage of net turnover) is practical for a concession.

Most key fields are consistently populated, and dates are logical. A minor inconsistency exists where "Value Classified: Yes" is stated, yet an estimated value is explicitly disclosed.

The tender explicitly identifies as "Green Procurement," which is a positive step. However, it lacks specific criteria or emphasis on social aspects or innovation, and is not EU-funded, limiting its overall sustainability ambition.