Electricity Supply for Production Building

This tender for electrical supply works is generally well-structured with clear requirements and transparent evaluation, but exhibits some ambiguity in procedure definition and lacks explicit sustainability criteria. The mandatory site visit dates were reasonable from the tender's reveal date.

The tender generally adheres to standard procurement practices with reasonable timelines and appropriate CPV codes. However, the procedure type (MS, E, N/A codes) is not clearly defined, and the combination of 'Negotiation Allowed' with 'lowest price wins' as the sole evaluation criterion creates a slight ambiguity regarding the exact procedural framework. The lack of explicit detail on mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided summaries is a minor omission.

The tender provides a clear description of the works, well-documented requirements, and unambiguous evaluation criteria (lowest price). Performance conditions, including the completion deadline, are clearly stated. The AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and easy to understand.

The tender is largely complete, providing all essential basic information, detailed requirements, and evaluation criteria. Location details are specific. The main gap is the lack of an explicit contract duration, although a project completion deadline is provided. The content of two image files is not summarized, but their titles suggest they are supplementary.

The tender demonstrates good fairness with full document access, disclosed value, and objective evaluation criteria. Electronic submission is supported. The requirements, including reference projects and technical capabilities, are standard for this type of specialized work and do not appear to be tailored to a specific company. The mandatory site visit dates, when considered from the tender's reveal date, provided reasonable notice.

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, enhancing practicality. Financing information (EU Funded) is provided. However, the lack of a clear contract start date and explicit contract duration reduces practicality for bidders in planning and resource allocation. The document URL is not explicitly provided but assumed to be part of the e-procurement system.

The data is largely consistent, with logical dates and no detected disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include the 'N/A' codes for procedure type and the slight contradiction between 'Value Classified: Yes' and the explicit disclosure of the estimated value.

The tender is flagged as 'EU Funded,' which typically implies higher standards. However, it explicitly lacks any stated green procurement, social, or innovation criteria, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability aspects into the project.