Legal Compliance100/100
While the procedure type (Below threshold - open competition) is stated, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and, critically, evaluation criteria in the provided information raises significant concerns regarding transparency and equal treatment of bidders.
•Absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided text
•Critical lack of explicit evaluation criteria
Clarity40/100
The project description, including the scope of works for each lot and accessibility standards (M4(2), M4(3)), is clear and well-defined. Submission instructions are also clearly outlined.
Completeness83/100
This is a major weakness. The tender notice explicitly states 'No documents attached' and 'No document content available,' making it impossible to assess the full requirements, terms, and conditions. The absence of explicit financial requirements beyond the estimated value is also a gap.
•No tender documents attached or accessible
•Missing explicit financial requirements beyond estimated value
Fairness60/100
The lack of explicit evaluation criteria is a significant concern for fairness, as it prevents potential bidders from understanding how their proposals will be objectively assessed. The requirement for separate site management for each lot, while practical, could potentially disadvantage smaller firms bidding for both.
•Critical lack of explicit evaluation criteria, impacting transparency and equal treatment
•Potential barrier for smaller firms due to separate site management requirement for both lots
Practicality40/100
The use of two distinct lots offers flexibility for bidders. The requirement for separate site management for each lot, if awarded both, is a practical measure to ensure quality and risk management. The online portal for submissions is standard practice.
Data Consistency100/100
The information provided is largely consistent, though the project reference (001562-2026) differs from the Project Id (DN802438) mentioned for submission, which could cause minor confusion. NUTS code N/A for a specific location (Swindon) is also an inconsistency.
•Inconsistency between 'Reference' (001562-2026) and 'Project Id' (DN802438) for submission
•NUTS code listed as N/A despite specific location mentioned
Sustainability0/100
The tender notice does not include any explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate broader public value objectives.
•Absence of explicit green procurement criteria
•Absence of explicit social criteria