Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login11 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
4 documents available with AI summaries
Historic England is seeking to lease an aircraft for four years, requiring 150 flying hours annually from Oxford airfield for oblique and vertical aerial photography.
Historic England seeks to lease an aircraft for four years, based at Oxford airfield, to conduct 150 hours of annual aerial photography for oblique and vertical imaging.
Historic England seeks a leased single-engine piston high-winged aircraft for 150 annual hours of aerial photography, based at Oxford airfield, for a four-year contract, with evaluation based on 30% price and 70% quality.
Historic England seeks to lease a single-engine piston high-winged aircraft for 150 annual flying hours over four years, based at Oxford airfield, for oblique and vertical aerial photography, with submissions due by March 6, 2026.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender exhibits significant deficiencies in legal compliance, clarity, completeness, and fairness due to missing critical details, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and eligibility. While the core service description is clear, the process lacks transparency and modern procurement practices.
The tender lacks detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, which are fundamental for legal compliance. Crucially, specific evaluation criteria for the 70% quality component are not provided, making the assessment process opaque. The missing tender reveal date also impacts transparency.
While the description of the required aircraft and service is clear, the absence of specific evaluation criteria for the 70% quality weighting significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders. This makes it challenging to understand how proposals will be assessed beyond a general price/quality split.
The tender is incomplete due to the absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and specific evaluation criteria for quality. These are essential components for a comprehensive tender package.
The lack of specific evaluation criteria for the substantial 70% quality component compromises the objectivity and transparency of the evaluation process, potentially leading to unfair outcomes. Furthermore, the absence of an electronic submission option limits equal access for all potential bidders.
The absence of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, increasing administrative burden for bidders. While other practical details like contract start and duration are clear, this omission is notable.
The tender generally exhibits good data consistency, with key dates, values, and descriptions aligning across the provided information. Minor issues include empty fields for 'Liable Person' and missing codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure'.
The tender completely lacks any mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate broader public value considerations into the procurement process.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required